Home Crime & Court Former hotel supervisor jailed for stealing from employer

Former hotel supervisor jailed for stealing from employer

Kuo tautea ha supavaisa faivahe ki mu'a ‘i he hōtele Tanoa ke ngāue pōpula hili ‘ene kaiha’asi ha pa’anga $21,299 ‘i he vaha’a taimi ko e māhina ‘e 7. Na’e kamata ngāue ‘a Selemana Fonua ta’u 40 he hotele ‘oku ne ta’u 38. Na’a ne fa’u mo liliu loi’i e pepa vahe ‘a e kautaha ‘o faka’asi ai ha ngaahi hingoa ‘o ha kau ngaue na’e ‘ikai totonu ia ke nau ma’u vahenga. Ka ne hoko ia ke homo ange ai ‘e he kautaha ‘a e ngaahi vahenga ko ‘eni ki he nima ‘o Fonua ‘o ne toki toho kākaa’i ia ‘e ia ma’ana. Na’a ne kei faka’ikai’i pe ‘e ia na’e ‘ikai ha’ane kaunga ki he kaiha’a ko ‘eni ka ne ‘ikai tui ‘a e fakamaau ki ai. Kuo ne ngāue pōpula ai ‘i ha ta’u ua ki he kaiha’a fakataha’i pe he ta’u ‘e ua ko ia mo hono tautea ngāue pōpula ta’u ‘e ua ki he liliu kākaa’i ‘o ha fakamatala. Na’e toloi leva ‘a e māhina e ono hono tautea ke ne nofo angalelei ai hili ha’ane ‘atā.

A pay supervisor at a Tanoa hotel who stole $21,299. 00 pa’anga over a seven-month period to finance a luxurious lifestyle for herself had been jailed for two years.

Selemana Fonua, 40, who had worked for the hotel when she was 38 had dishonestly manufactured a false spreadsheet which included the names of a number of fictitious or “ghost” employees thereby inflating the wages bill for Tanoa (Tonga).

By ghost employees, the judge meant employees who  were not entitled to wages during the relevant period.

The court heard Fonua did not accept that she was guilty of any wrongdoing.

She suggested that others were responsible for the fraud, although Mr. Cato said she did not give any evidence herself or advance evidence to support it.

Justice Cato said he considered the starting point of two years and six months adopted by Paulsen CJ to be appropriate in Fonua’s case.

Mr. Cato took into consideration Ms Fonua’s persistent offending over the period, her disregard of her employer’s trust as well as her refusal to accept responsibility,

The final six months of her sentence of two years imprisonment was suspended on the condition that she committed no further offences punishable by imprisonment during her suspension.

Mr. Cato made no order for restitution.

“None was sought and I have no evidence that Ms Fonua is able to repay any part of the sum stolen, in any event.

“On the falsification charge, she is sentenced to 2 years imprisonment to be served concurrently with her sentence on the theft charge.”