Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 202

Biden: Nuclear ‘Armageddon’ risk highest since ’62 crisis

NEW YORK (AP) — President Joe Biden said Thursday that the risk of nuclear “Armageddon” is at the highest level since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, as Russian officials speak of the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons after suffering massive setbacks in the eight-month invasion of Ukraine.

Speaking at a fundraiser for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Biden said Russian President Vladimir Putin was “a guy I know fairly well” and the Russian leader was “not joking when he talks about the use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons.”

Biden added, “We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” He suggested the threat from Putin is real “because his military is — you might say — significantly underperforming.”

U.S. officials for months have warned of the prospect that Russia could use weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine as it has faced a series of strategic setbacks on the battlefield, though Biden’s remarks marked the starkest warnings yet issued by the U.S. government about the nuclear stakes.

It was not immediately clear whether Biden was referring to any new assessment of Russian intentions. As recently as this week, though, U.S. officials have said they have seen no change to Russia’s nuclear forces that would require a change in the alert posture of U.S. nuclear forces.

“We have not seen any reason to adjust our own strategic nuclear posture, nor do we have indication that Russia is preparing to imminently use nuclear weapons,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Tuesday.

The 13-day showdown in 1962 that followed the U.S. discovery of the Soviet Union’s secret deployment of nuclear weapons to Cuba is regarded by experts as the closest the world has ever come to nuclear annihilation. The crisis during President John F. Kennedy’s administration sparked a renewed focus on arms control on both sides of the Iron Curtain.

Biden also challenged Russian nuclear doctrine, warning that the use of a lower-yield tactical weapon could quickly spiral out of control into global destruction.

“I don’t think there is any such a thing as the ability to easily use a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon,” Biden said.

He added that he was still “trying to figure” out Putin’s “off-ramp” in Ukraine.

“Where does he find a way out?” Biden asked. “Where does he find himself in a position that he does not not only lose face but lose significant power within Russia?”

Putin has repeatedly alluded to using his country’s vast nuclear arsenal, including last month when he announced plans to conscript Russian men to serve in Ukraine.

“I want to remind you that our country also has various means of destruction … and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said Sept. 21, adding with a lingering stare at the camera, “It’s not a bluff.”

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said last week that the U.S. has been “clear” to Russia about what the “consequences” of using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine would be.

“This is something that we are attuned to, taking very seriously, and communicating directly with Russia about, including the kind of decisive responses the United States would have if they went down that dark road,” Sullivan said.

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said earlier Thursday that Putin understood that the “world will never forgive” a Russian nuclear strike.

“He understands that after the use of nuclear weapons he would be unable any more to preserve, so to speak, his life, and I’m confident of that,” Zelenskyy said.

Biden’s comments came during a private fundraiser for Democratic Senate candidates at the Manhattan home of James and Kathryn Murdoch. He tends to be more unguarded — often speaking with just rough notes — in such settings, which are open only to a handful of reporters without cameras or recording devices.

Campaigner sued by Princess Pilolevu appeals for ‘urgent’ financial supports to pay legal expenses

The Tongan crusader of ‘Say no to drugs’ campaign is appealing to his supporters for more money to help fund his legal costs.

Afimeimo’unga Hola

Anti-drugs Campaigner Afimeimo’unga Hola said he needed it urgently for this Friday.

He said he would use the money to cover legal expenses of his two remaining civil court cases filed by the Princess and an Indian businessman.

Hola also said the decision for the defamation lawsuit filed against him by Deputy Prime Minister Sāmiu Vaipulu is expected to be announced on Tuesday next week. Lawyer Clive Edwards Senior and another Indian businessman sued Hola but he said the duo had cancelled the legal actions.

It comes after the Princess sued Hola following an allegation he made during his national anti-drugs campaign.

The allegations triggered others including Hon Vaipulu, Edwards and the Indian business operators to sue Hola.

The Princess had described the allegations as lies and is suing Hola for TOP$10,000.

Hola was widely supported by the PTOA Kolope Foundation (Democrats) supporters with chapters from the US, New Zealand and Australia raising TOP$22,000 to pay for his lawyers and legal fees last year.

Hola was at the centre of media attention last year as a former user who has become an anti-drugs campaigner, working with school children and warning them of the evil nature of the trade.

He had been described as the first major crusader against drugs in Tonga

He was previously banned by the courts from using Facebook and the internet while his cases were before the magistrate’s court.

Prisons Commissioner accused of lying over denial of Lavulavu’s meeting while on leave of absence

Tonga’s Prisons boss Sēmisi Tapueluelu is facing accusations of lying over his denial of prisoner and fraudster ‘Etuate Lavulavu’s attending a meeting to seek financial assistance for his legal expenses.

Prisons Commissioner Sēmisi Tapueluelu. Photo/Ombudsman Office Tonga (cropped)

On August 8, a statement which appeared to have been released from Mr Tapueluelu’s office said that it “wishes to correct the media misinformation suggesting that Prisoner ‘Etuate Lavulavu’s Leave of Absence (LOA) was approved to attend a meeting with Ports of Authority Tonga (PAT) on behalf of Inter-Pacific Ltd (IPL)”.

“We would like to clarify that prisoner ‘Etuate Lavulavu’s LOA was not approved to attend a meeting on behalf of  IPL with PAT”, the statement read.

However, a court document seen by Kaniva News this week proved otherwise.

In his response to the Lord Chief Justice on June 22 after Justice Whitten raised his concern after a complaint from a senior lawyer over Lavulavu’s LOA in question, Mr Tapueluelu confirmed that Mr Lavulavu was indeed granted a leave of absence (LOA)  to attend the meeting at the Ports Authority Tonga office.

“In particular to your concerns Mr Lavulavu as per his LOA conditions requested permission to attend a meeting at Ports Authority Tonga for financial assistance which was granted”, Mr Tapueluelu told the Lord Chief Justice.

“This is in reference to his meeting with Inter Pacific Limited which owes a debt to Mr Lavulavu”, he also said.

 “Based on your email we issued a revocation order of his LOA and he was escorted back to Tolitoli Prison on the same day. He was given an opportunity to provide an explanation and we conducted a brief investigation of the case”.

Our report yesterday on Lavulavu’s LOA and the email exchanges between the Lord Chief Justice and Mr Tapueluelu had attracted criticisms from local media denouncing what appeared to be Mr Tapueluelu’s false denial of the media reports at the time.

Lord Chief Justice concerns

As Kaniva News reported yesterday, the email exchanges between Mr Tapueluelu and the Lord Chief Justice appeared to show Mr Whitten was  seriously concerned after he received the complaint against Mr Lavulavu’s leave. 

Mr Whitten emailed Tapueluelu and said: “I bring this to your attention, in case you were not aware, as Mr Lavulavu is currently supposed to be serving a prison sentence.

“Could you kindly explain the basis upon which Mr Lavulavu was granted a leave of absence for this purpose?” Mr Whitten asked Mr Tapueluelu.

“My reading of the Prisons Act, and the purposes specified for a leave of absence, such as medical examination, assessment or treatment; to attend an educational or training course; to participate in paid employment or community service; or compassionate purposes, makes it difficult to see how a business meeting might fall within the last of those prescribed, namely, ‘any other purpose as the Commissioner thinks fit.”

The Lord Chief Justice also wanted to know about prisoners medical leave grounds and entitlements. He asked the Commissioner to explain the prison food after Lavulavu’s health practitioner Dr Sione Lātu’s repeated recommendation of a ‘home care’ for him. Mr Whitten also asked Mr Tapueluelu whether this needs a leave of absence be granted for the entirety of Mr Lavulavu’s sentence.

“On the basis of Mr Lavulavu ‘s visit to the Ports Authority being for the indirect purpose of procuring funds for his legal expenses on his appeal (in which he is now representing himself), can any prisoner be granted a leave of absence for the purpose of working to earn money for his/her legal expenses?” asked Mr Whitten.

Mr Tapueluelu did not respond to these concerns by the Chief Justice.

Regarding Lavulavu’s LOA, Tapueluelu said: “I talked to the Ports authority Chief Executive Officer Mr ‘Alomailesini about Mr Lavulavu ‘s involvement in this official meeting. He asserted that it was not a board meeting nor an official meeting. It was a ten-minute follow-up on any debt owed by PAT to IPL. Mr Lavulavu ‘s presence was simply to inquire of the debt owed by IPL to him to pay for his appeal.

“Mr Lavulavu did not breach his LOA conditions.”

The judge said it was not clear why Lavulavu had to visit the Ports Authority simply because he claimed that Inter Pacific owed him money.

“One would have expected such matters to be dealt with by further correspondence or telephone and by Inter Pacific ‘s own lawyer,” Lord Chief Justice Whitten said.

“It is not clear why a “Revocation Order” of Mr Lavulavu’s leave of absence was issued upon receipt of my enquiry if the reason for him being at the Ports Authority was known to the Prison in advance and had been approved.”

‘Etuate and his wife Akosita Lavulavu, who was then a Cabinet Minister, were convicted of three counts of obtaining a total of TP$558,600 by false pretences.

They were sentenced last year to six years imprisonment with the final year of Mrs Lavulavu’s sentence being suspended for two years on conditions. They appealed against their sentences which was expected to be heard next month.

Mr Whitten’s concerns come after critics were seriously concerned about the timing of the temporarily release of the Lavulavus in August last year, just about a month after Mr Whitten denied their bail bid on July 9, 2021 while awaiting their upcoming appeal application.

It was reported at the time that the release was made under the Prisons Commissioner’s legal discretion.

Financial authority lists Dubai-based Validus as a scam, warns people not to invest or trade

The Financial Markets Authority has listed a financial company popular with some Tongans as a scam.

The FMA urged people not to trade or invest with the company.

“We are concerned that Validus is operating in breach of the New Zealand financial markets legislation,” the Authority said.

“Validus is providing financial services in New Zealand without registration as a financial service provider as required by the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008.

“We strongly recommend that investors do not trade or invest with entities that are not registered and/or licensed in New Zealand.”

The Tongan community has already been affected by scams, including pyramid schemes in which people have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In June Kaniva News reported on a Onecoin scam that cost people thousands of dollars, including a woman who lost all her savings.

As we reported at the time, the Financial Markets Authority warned that scammers often took advantage of people’s desire to achieve financial goals such as owning a home, promising to help them ‘get rich quick’ with little or no risk of losing their money.

However, the FMA warned that if people handed over money it could be very hard to get it back. It said Pacific communities in New Zealand were more at-risk from investment scams.

Scammers often took advantage of close-knit community groups such as churches, convincing one member who then helps them convince others in the group.

Validus launched its services with an event at the Trusts arena in West Auckland  on August 5.

Validus appears to be based in Dubai. It claims to offer a 500% return on investments in just 13 months, but it is clear that people are expected to keep selling the scheme to others to keep money coming in – what Validus calls “affiliate marketing.”

Returns on such schemes are only possible so long as new investors sign up. When people become aware of the nature of the scheme and stop investing, there is no more money and the scheme collapses, leaving everybody – except the scheme’s operators – out of pocket

Some Tongans have urged others to invest in the company and attend their seminars in Auckland.

They have claimed that the seminars and the presence of company staff in Auckland meant they were legitimate.

Some have even printed t-shirts with the name of Validus and distributed them to members of the Tongan community. They have also promoted it online.

Others have described the company as a scam because of the way they collected money and recruited people. They registered their members by collecting their identities, addresses and personal information before allowing them to deposit their money. 

Validus describes itself on its website as a “training academy.”

It claims to offer a brokerage service registered in the Caribbean islands of St Vincent and the Grenadines, which have been described by the US State Department as a major centre for laundering drug money.

Covid-19 update: 9809 new community cases reported this week, 166 people in hospital

‘Oku taupotu ‘i lalo ha fakamatala fakaTonga

There are 9809 new community cases of Covid-19 in the country in the last week, the Ministry of Health is reporting.

There have been 54 virus-related deaths in that time.

One of those who died was less than 10 years old, one was in their 30s, two were in their 40s, two were in their 50s, seven were in their 60s, 11 were in their 70s, 16 were in their 80s and 14 were aged over 90. Of these people, 24 were women and 30 were men.

Of the deaths being reported today, 12 were from the Auckland region, five were from Waikato, three were from Bay of Plenty, two were from Lakes, one was from Tairawhiti, two were from Hawke’s Bay, one was from Taranaki, four were from MidCentral, three were from Wellington region, two were from Nelson Marlborough, nine were from Canterbury, three were from South Canterbury and six were from Southern.

There were also 166 people in hospital with the virus, including eight in ICU.

Last week Ministry of Health Deputy Director-General Dr Andrew Old said case numbers were continuing to decline but “Covid is not going away”.

Some secondary school principals are warning that many Year 13 students are doing badly this year.

They say the cumulative effect of two-and-a-half years of pandemic disruption has taken a heavy toll on many teenagers’ achievement and motivation.

Schools are trying to find extra teachers and tutors so they can spend their share of $20 million for catch-up learning.

FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA

‘Oku ‘i ai ‘a e keisi Kōviti – 19 fo’ou ‘i he komiunitī ‘i he fonua ni ‘i he uike kuo ‘osi, ko e lipooti mei he Potungāue Mo’ui.Na’e hoko mo e mate ‘e 54 pea ‘oku fekau’aki ‘eni mo e vailasi.Ko e taha ‘o e kau mate na’e si’i hifo ia ‘i he ta’u 10, taha na’e ta’u tolungofulu tupu, ua ta’u fāngofulu tupu, ua nimangofulu tupu, toko fitu onongofulu tupu, toko 11 ta’u 70, 16 ta’u valungofulu tupu, 14 hivangofulu tupu. Ko e toko 24 ‘o e kakai ko ‘eni ko e kakai fefine pea toko 30 ko e kakai tangata. Ko e kau mate na’e lipooti mai ‘i he ‘aho ni, ko etoko 12 mei he vāhenga ‘Aokalani,5 mei Waikato, 3 mei Bay of Plenty, 2 mei Lakes, 1 mei Tairawhiti, 2 mei Hawkes Bay, 1 mei Talanaki, 4 mei MidCentral, 3 mei he vāhenga Uelingatoni, 2 mei Nelson Marlborough, 9 mei Canterbury, 3 mei he fakatonga ‘o Canterbury, mo e 6 mei Southern. ‘Oku ‘i ai ‘a e kakai ‘e toko 166 ‘oku tākoto fale mahaki ‘i he vailasi, kau ai mo e toko 8 ‘i he tauhi’anga kau mahaki tokanga’i makehe. Na’e pehe ‘e he Tokoni Talekita Pule ‘o e Potungāue Mo’ui ‘i he uike kuo ‘osi, Dr Andrew Old, ‘oku holo ai pē ‘a e toko lahi ‘o e kau puke ki lalo ka ‘oku te’eki pe ke mavahe ‘a Kōviti.’Oku fakatokanga ‘a e kau puleako ‘o e ngaahi kolisi ki he ‘ikai sai ‘a e ako ‘a e fānau ako ta’u 13 ‘i he ta’u ni. ‘Oku nau pehē ko e ola ‘eni ‘o e ta’u ‘e 2 mo e konga ‘o e mahaki faka’auha kuo ‘ikai ola lelei ai e ako mo ‘ikai toe fie ako e toko lahi ‘o e to’utupu. ‘Oku feinga ‘a e ngaahi ako ke kumi ha kau faiako mo ha kau tiuta makehe ke faka’aonga’i ai ‘a e pa’anga ‘e 20 miliona, ke tulituli hake ‘a e polokalama ako. 

Lord Chief Justice rejects Lavulavu’s request to stand down from his second bail hearing

An application by disgraced former politician ‘Etuate Lavulav for Lord Chief Justice Whitten to recuse himself from hearing his second bail application has been dismissed.

(L-R) ‘Etuate Lavulavu and ‘Akosita Lavulavu

Lord Chief Justice Whitten, presiding, told the Court of appeal that Lavulavu had not proven that there were grounds under which he should stand down.

On June 4, 2021, Lavulavu and his wife, who was then a Cabinet Minister, were convicted of three counts of obtaining a total of TP$558,600 by false pretences.

On 30 June 30, 2021 , they appealed against their convictions.

On July 2,  2021 they were sentenced to six years imprisonment with the final year of Mrs Lavulavu’s sentence being suspended for two years on conditions. They appealed against their sentences and filed an application for bail. The application was dismissed by Judge Whitten.

On July 7 this year the couple filed a second application for bail.

On July 29 Mr Lavulavu filed an application for Lord Chief Justice Whitten to step down  and not hear the application.

Mrs Lavulavu did not join in the recusal application.

Mr Lavulavu claimed that the judge should not hear the second bail application because he had a conflict of interest and/or might actually or presumably be biased against him.

He based his claim on the fact that the judge had presided over civil proceedings between the  ‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga Royal Institute and the Lavulavus and the Auditor General.

He also cited the fact that the judge had heard and refused the first bail application.

He also cited the fact that the judge had communicated with the Commissioner of Prisons in relation to a recent leave of absence granted to Mr Lavulavu.

The judge said the original civil proceedings began before he took up his office in Tonga. He case managed the proceeding until it was almost ready for trial, but  did not make any rulings in relation to any of the issues in dispute or in respect of Mr Lavulavu.

The second claim regarding the two bail applications was also dismissed. The judge said the first application was under-prepared. The second appeal contained a far more developed set of arguments.

“If there are more developed arguments or other arguments to be considered on the second bail application, then my refusal of the first could have no impact on my consideration of the second,” the judge said.

The third grounds concerned communications between the judge and the Commissioner of Prisons.

On June 4, 2022, Lord Chief Justice Whitten wrote to the Commissioner of Prisons, Semisi Tapueluelu, to say that he had been told that Lavulavu had attended a meeting at the offices of the Port Authority in relation to a company by the name lnter Pacific Limited.

“I bring this to your attention, in case you were not aware, as Mr Lavulavu is currently supposed to be serving a prison sentence,” the judge wrote.

“Could you kindly explain the basis upon which Mr Lavulavu was granted a leave of absence for this purpose? My reading of the Prisons Act, and the purposes specified for a leave of absence, such as medical examination, assessment or treatment; to attend an educational or training course; to participate in paid employment or community service; or compassionate purposes, makes it difficult to see how a business meeting might fall within the last of those prescribed, namely, ‘any other purpose as the Commissioner thinks fit ‘.”

Tapueluelu said Lavulavu had been granted a leave of absence for a medical assessment and to meet with his legal counsel.

“His state of health is deteriorating according to specialist Dr Sione Latu,” the commissioner wrote.

“Based on your email we issued a revocation order of his LOA and he was escorted back to Tolitoli Prison on the same day.

“I talked to the Ports authority Chief Executive Officer Mr ‘Alomailesini about Mr Lavulavu ‘s involvement in this official meeting. He asserted that it was not a board meeting nor an official meeting. It was a ten-minute follow-up on any debt owed by PAT to IPL. Mr Lavulavu ‘s presence was simply to inquire of the debt owed by IPL to him to pay for his appeal.

“Mr Lavulavu did not breach his LOA conditions.”

The judge said it was not clear why Lavulavu had to visit the Ports Authority simply because he claimed that Inter Pacific owed him money.

“One would have expected such matters to be dealt with by further correspondence or telephone and by Inter Pacific ‘s own lawyer,” Lord Chief Justice Whitten said.

“It is not clear why a “Revocation Order” of Mr Lavulavu’s leave of absence was issued upon receipt of my enquiry if the reason for him being at the Ports Authority was known to the Prison in advance and had been approved.”

“The text of the emails clearly states that the purpose of those communications was to inquire of the Commissioner of Prisons about Mr Lavulavu’s leave of absence but more importantly how the Commissioner of Prisons exercised his discretion under S. 46 of the Prisons Act in relation to the granting of a leave of absence.

“The significance in the current context was that where applications for bail pending appeal are made, the availability of a leave of absence during the relevant period could be a relevant consideration.

“Therefore, in my view, those exchanges do not contain any expression on my part which reflect any prejudice or affect my ability to impartially consider and determine the second bail application.

“Accordingly, the third ground also fails.

“The application for recusal is dismissed.”

Construction begins on NZ leadership centre in Tonga

Construction of Tonga’s Pacific Leadership Development Centre at His Majesty’s Armed Forces (HMAF) Masefield Naval Base, Nuku’alofa, has begun.

The Leadership Centre is funded by a joint New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) and New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) initiative and will provide a location for HMAF leadership training, meetings and talanoa (conversation).

The $NZ5.2 million centre will incorporate a fale-inspired conference centre, and classrooms and staff facilities. Construction is expected to be completed by the end of 2023.

The HMAF Leadership Centre is the second of four centres that the NZDF and MFAT are funding in the Pacific region.

“The first, the Kumul Leadership Centre at Murray Barracks in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea opened in April and the Papua New Guinea Defence Force has been making full use of it since then,” said Lieutenant Colonel Gordon Milward, Programme Principal for the Pacific Leader Development Programme (PLDP).

The final two centres will be built in Fiji and Vanuatu, in support of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces and Vanuatu Mobile Force.

The Leadership Centres are a component of the NZDF-led and co-MFAT funded Pacific Leader Development Programme which commenced in June 2019.

The programme supports the military forces of Fiji, Tonga and Papua New Guinea, and the Vanuatu Police Force, in the development of bespoke leadership frameworks and the delivery of different levels of leadership training for their personnel.

Lieutenant Colonel Milward said that the number of personnel who are completing leadership training was increasing rapidly.

“Over the past three years the NZDF has supported the training of about 2500 leaders across all four nations, with 327 of those being in Tonga, ranging from Lead Self through to Lead Organisation levels.”

Each nation’s Leadership Framework is based on the NZDF Leadership Framework, but incorporates each nation’s specific values and culture.

The NZDF provides advanced design, development, delivery and facilitation training support for each nation’s leadership programme through a team of six NZDF Institute for Leader Development personnel based at Trentham Military Camp.

Senior uniformed NZDF personnel, with the role of Technical Advisor – Leadership Mentors, will also be seconded to each country for a period of three years.

“As a result of the programme, Tonga, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu and Fiji are collaborating for an exciting and innovative future in leader development that will be of increasing benefit for all five nations,” Lieutenant Colonel Milward said.

Axed border testing leaves NZ flying blind on new Covid-19 variants – experts

‘Oku taupotu ‘i lalo ha fakamatala faka-Tonga

New Zealand is on the back foot in preparing for new Covid-19 variants now requirements for international arrivals to test have ended, health experts say.

International arrivals are no longer required to test for Covid-19. Photo: RNZ / Liu Chen

Prior to the change in border rules, which was implemented on 12 September, international travellers needed to complete rapid-antigen tests (RATs) on the day they arrived in New Zealand or the day after, and again five or six days later.

Now arrivals are encouraged to test, but it is not a requirement.

A Flourish data visualization

In the week prior to the removal of the requirement to test there were 525 border cases.

This plummeted to 94 reported cases in the six days after the new rule came into effect. Although it was possible some border cases had been counted as community cases in Ministry of Health data, due to changes in the way data was being gathered.

University of Auckland microbiologist Siouxsie Wiles said while the reported numbers were murky due to reporting changes, it was doubtful only 94 people out of almost 70,000 travellers who arrived in New Zealand, had Covid-19.

“I’m not a statistician, but that seems highly unlikely, versus a change in our protocol to require people to be tested.”

Wiles said border testing provided an early warning system of new variants entering New Zealand, and without this, variants would spread in the community before being noticed.

“We’ll be reliant on the tests that have been done in the community, or more increasingly the wastewater testing, looking for variants.”

A Ministry of Health spokesperson said arrivals are still given rapid antigen test kits on arrival and encouraged to test and report their results by phone.

“People returning from overseas who return a RAT result that is positive are encouraged to get a PCR test from a community testing centre or healthcare provider and tell the person who does their test that they have been overseas in the last seven days.”

But the spokesperson said the ministry would not report border cases separately to community cases anymore.

It was not just the public who would not know how many cases are border related. Environmental Science and Research (ESR) professor Mike Bunce said border information was no longer included with samples sent for genomic sequencing.

He said this was because the dismantling of the Covid-19 Protection Framework meant an Air Border Order which had allowed ESR to get data from customs was no longer available.

01 February 2022, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Greifswald: Medical technical assistant Denise Dittmar pipettes swab samples from test centers and prepares them for further examination in the automated machine in the PCR laboratory

Covid-19 samples being tested in a lab. Photo: AFP

In the last batch of samples sequenced there were 275 samples identified as border cases. But he would not know how much this had reduced since the testing requirement was dropped until the next fortnightly reporting was collated.

Bunce expected the numbers identified as border cases had dropped, due to the “soft compliance” approach of relying on health providers to collect the information.

“It’s not a big kicker at the moment,” he said, because Covid-19 variants in the community matched those detected at the border.

“However if something new turns up, I would say we’ve softened one part of our surveillance system”.

If the number of samples identified as border cases drop to about 20 it would not be enough samples to determine the proportion of each variant entering the country.

“We’ve just got an underpowered data set,” Bunce said.

University of Auckland researcher David Welch had also been working with genomic sequencing of Covid-19 samples. Welch was critical of the decision to drop border tests.

He said a system requiring people to tell health providers they had travelled overseas in the past seven days was too “ad hoc”.

“There’s always been a three-pronged approach to gathering samples,” he said. One was from hospital cases, so scientists could see if a certain strain of Covid-19 caused more severe cases.

The second was community samples, to see what was circulated. And border samples were the third prong, and gave health specialists an early warning system for what variant might hit the community in two to four weeks time.

“We are losing one leg of the stool.”

Auckland Airport arrivals

Arrivals to Auckland Airport (File photo). Photo: 123RF

The information from border cases provided a two to four week headstart he said, and had allowed modellers to predict when a new variant might set off a wave of cases.

FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA

Kuo faingatātamaki ‘a Nu’u Sila ‘i he teuteu ko ‘eni ki he fōtunga kehe fo’ou ‘o e Koviti 19 tu’unga he kuo ngata ‘a e fiema’u ia ke tesi ‘a e kau folau tū’uta fakavaha’apule’anga’, ko e lau ‘eni ‘a e kau mataotao he mo’ui’.

Ki mu’a ‘i hono liliu ‘a e tu’utu’uni ki he kau’āfonua’, ‘a ia na’e fakahoko ‘eni ‘i he ‘aho 12 Sepitema’, na’e fiema’u ki he kau folau fakavaha’apule’anga k eke nau fakakakato ‘a e tesi rapid-antigen (RAT) ‘i he ‘aho a’a nau tū’uta ai ‘i Nu’u Sila’ pe ‘aho hili ia’, pea mo e ngaahi ‘aho ‘e nima pe ono ki mui ai’.

‘I he lolotonga’ ni ‘oku fakalotolahi’i ken au tesi ka ‘oku ‘ikai ko ha fie ma’u (likaemeni pe requirement). 

‘I he uike ki mu’a pea to’o ‘a e likaemeni ki he tesi’ na’e ‘i ai ‘a e keisi kau’āfonua (border pe pōtā) ‘e 525.

Na’e mahiki ‘eni ki he keisi ne lipooti ‘e 94 ‘i he ‘aho ‘e ono hili ‘a hono kamata ‘o e lao fo’ou’. Neongo na’e ‘i ai ‘a e faingamālie na’e ‘i ai ‘a e ngaahi keisi pōtā ‘e ni’ihi na’e lau ia ko e ngaahi keisi komiunitī ‘i he ngaahi fakamatala fakasitētistika pe taata (data) ‘a e Potungāue Mo’ui’.

Na’e pehē ‘e he maikolopaiolosisi mei he ‘Univēsiti ‘o ‘Okalani’ Siouxsie Wiles lolotonga na’e  tu’u fehu’ia ‘a e ngaahi fika tupu mei he ngaahi liliu kuo lipooti, na’e ta’epau ‘a e kakai ‘e toko 94 mei he mei toko 70,000 ‘o e kau folau ne tū’uta ‘i Nu’u Sila, ne nau ma’u ‘a e Koviti 19.

‘Oku ‘ikai ko ha setisitieni au, ka ‘oku ngali mā’olunga ‘a e tui ‘e ‘ikai hoko, fakahoa ki ha liliu ki he’etau polotokolo (protocol – tu’utu’uni kuo tali ke muiaki) ne fiema’u ai ‘a e kakai ke tesi.”

Pehē ‘e Wiles na’e fakaai ‘e he tesi ‘i he pōtaa’ ha fakatokanga ki ha fōtunga kehe fo’ou kuo hū ki Nu’u Sila, pea ka ‘ikai ‘eni, ‘e mofele ‘a e velieni ‘i he kominitii’ ki mu’a pea nau fakatokanga’i.

“Te tau fakafalala pe ‘i he ngaahi tesi ne fakahoko ‘i he kominitii’, pe ko hano toe fakalahi ‘o e ngaahi tesi ‘i he vai’uli tuku ange (wastewater) ke kumi e velieni pe fōtunga kehenga’.  

Ko e kakai kuo nau foki mei muli pea positive ‘a honau tesi RAT ‘oku fakalotolahi’i ken au tesi PCR mei ha senitā tesi kominitī pe fakaai ‘o hono tokangaekina ‘o e mo’ui mo tala ki he toko taha ‘oku’ ne fai ‘a hono tesi’ na’a nau ‘i muli ‘i he ‘aho ‘e fitu kuo hili’”.

Ka na’e pehē ‘e he matāpulelea’ ‘e ‘ikai toe lipooti ‘e he potungāue ‘a e ngaahi keisi he pōtaa’ ‘o kehe mei he ngaahi keisi he komiunitii’.

‘Oku ‘ikai ko e kakai pe ‘e ‘ikai ke nau ‘ilo ko e keisi ‘e fiha ne tupu mei he pōtaa’. Pehē ‘e he palōfesa he Environmental Science and Research (ESR) professor Mike Bunce kuo ‘ikai toe fakakau ‘a e fakamatala ki he pōtaa’ ia ‘i hono ‘ave kef ai hano genomic sequence.

I he ngaahi semipolo ne toki fakahokohoko’ ko e 275 ai mei he pōtaa’. Ka ‘oku ‘ikai ilo ko e fiha ai kuo fakasi’isi’i ‘i he ngaahi fiema’u tesi ko ia kuo holo’ ki mu’a ha maau ‘a e lipooti ‘i he uike ‘e ua ka hoko’.

Kapau e holo ‘a e lahi e semipolo kuo ma’u’ lolotonga e holo ‘a e keisi he pōtaa’ ki he 20 nai ‘e ‘ikai fe’unga ‘a e ngaahi semipolo ke fakafuofua ai ‘a e poloposio ‘o e velieni ‘oku hū mai ki he fonua’.

Na’a’ ne pehe ko e founga ko ia ‘oku fiema’u ai ‘a e kakai’ ke nau tala ki he ngaahi va’a ki he mo’ui na’a nau folau ki muli ‘i he ‘aho ‘e fitu kuohili’ na’e fu’u fakataumu’a pe ia ki he me’a ko ia’.

Ko e fika ua ko e ngaahi semipolo fakakomiunitii’, ke tau sio ko e ha me’a kuo tau lava ‘o vilohi’. Pea ko e fika tolu ai ko e semipolo mei he pōtaa’, pea ‘oange ai ki he kau taukei makehe ‘o e Mo’ui ha fakatokanga kei taimi ka ‘i ai ha toe valieni ‘e t1o ‘i ha uike ‘e ua pe fā ki mu’a.

Boxing: Joseph Parker knocked out for first time as a pro by Joe Joyce

By RNZ.co.nz

Kiwi heavyweight Joseph Parker has been knocked out by Englishman Joe Joyce in the 11th round of their bout in Manchester this morning.

Parker did his best to match Joyce’s aggression in the earlier rounds, but it was to no avail. Joyce was well ahead on all three cards when the KO happened – the first time Parker has been knocked out in a professional fight.

Joyce came out firing in the 11th round, with some agression from Parker in the previous one seeing Joyce unlock his last reserve of energy and floor Parker with a left hook.

Speaking after the bout, Joyce said it took “everything I’ve got” to win the fight.

Joyce is now the WBO interim heavyweight world champion and will have the chance to take on Oleksander Usyk for the undisputed crown.

Joe Joyce punches Joseph Parker during the Vacant WBO Interim World Heavyweight Championship fight between Joe Joyce and Joseph Parker at AO Arena on September 24, 2022 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images)

Joe Joyce punches Joseph Parker during the Vacant WBO Interim World Heavyweight Championship fight between Joe Joyce and Joseph Parker at AO Arena in Manchester, England. Photo: Getty Images / Alex Livesey

Comancheros gang president to stay behind bars after being deemed high risk

By RNZ.co.nz

The Comancheros gang boss has been denied parole for a second time in four months because he is still considered an excessive risk if released.

Comanchero Motorcycle Club president Pasilika Naufahu has been denied parole for a second time in four months. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Dan Cook

Pasilika Naufahu appeared before the Parole Board on 12 September, and was again refused early release after he first became eligible for parole on 11 May.

The 35-year-old was sentenced to 10 years in prison in February 2021 for participating in an organised criminal group, conspiring to deal in a Class B controlled drug, money laundering, unlawful possession of ammunition and assault.

His sentence was later reduced to nine years and three months by the Court of Appeal.

The Comanchero Motorcycle Club president told the board he had done everything he possibly could in prison to show he was a responsible citizen.

Naufahu continued to deny his involvement in drug dealing and confirmed he would continue to be involved in the gang, although he claimed he would obey any orders made by the Parole Board.

Board chairman Sir Ron Young said it was pointed out that Naufahu had the responsibility of caring for young children, and that appeared to conflict with the fact of his significant involvement in money laundering and conspiracy to supply drugs.

“The idea of him as a supportive father and husband is completely inconsistent with his desire to continue on in the Comancheros gang and the prospect of further offending if released.”

The 501, who was deported to New Zealand in 2016, was arrested after raids across Auckland in April 2019, resulting in more than $3.7 million in assets being seized including luxury cars, motorbikes, high-end luggage and jewellery.

Naufahu had been a sergeant-at-arms for the Comancheros in Australia, where he had had a high level of involvement in the gang, together with his brother. He had a number of convictions in Australia, including for violence.

Young said the board was convinced Naufahu remained an undue risk and could not be released.

“We are satisfied he is at high risk of re-offending given his past, given his personality, and given his involvement in the Comancheros gang.”

A psychologist considered a special treatment programme for violent offending would adequately meet Naufahu’s rehabilitative needs.

Naufahu, however, believed he had been treated seriously unfairly and he would not be transferred to another prison to complete the programme.

“He did not think in any event that programme would be helpful for him because he did not consider he was a violent person and so that would be essentially a waste of time for him.”

Young said the board was confident the programme recommended was the appropriate risk-based treatment for him and hoped he would undertake it with an open mind.

“We can see no reason why he cannot transfer prisons to undertake that programme and we hope that can happen as soon as reasonably possible,” Young said.

“Given he is currently at high risk of re-offending and without any further rehabilitative programmes it is difficult to see the way out of prison for him before his sentence end date.”

Naufahu, who has a statutory release date of July 2028, would be seen again by the board before the end of December 2023.