Monday, August 4, 2025
Newsletter
Support Kaniva
Home Blog Page 225

Son of Filipino dictator likely to seize power – but did he once have a Tongan passport?

By
Kaniva Staff
-

Bongbong  Marcos, the son of former dictator Ferdinand Marcos, may be about to become the Philippines’ new president.

Philippine presidential candidate Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos Jnr is the son of former dictator Ferdinand Marcos. Photo: EPA

Marcos Snr, who was driven from power by a popular revolution, acquired a Tongan passport in 1986, as did his wife and two of his children.

Bongbong Marcos has allied himself with Sara Duterte daughter of current president Duterte, who has presided over a regime that has encouraged police to murder drug dealers, shut down opposition media and silenced his critics.

Marcos Jnr, 64, has a seemingly unstoppable lead in the elections, with 18 million votes against his rival’s 8.5 million. The threat of him gaining power seriously worries the country’s democrats.

He has worked overtime to whitewash his father’s dictatorship and persuade voters that Ferdinand Marcos and his wife Imelda – famous for her enormous collection of shoes – did not steal billions of dollars, kill and torture opponents, leave millions of people starving and destroy the economy.

After he was overthrown, the Marcoses and at least two of their children acquired Tongan passports from King Tupou IV in July 1986. The king was running an illegal racket selling Tongan passports to mostly Chinese citizens. Two kinds of Tongan passport were for sale to foreigners: the Tonga Protected Persons Passport and the Tongan National Passport (issued to those who became naturalised).

Mrs Marcos initially denied that she had a Tongan passport, but then admitted she may have been given one, but claimed she had not applied for it or paid for it.

King Taufa’āhau Tupou IV. Photo/Wikipedia

It is not certain whether Bongbong was one of the children who acquired a Tongan passport.

The sale of an estimated 7000 passports raised about US$26 million, nearly all of which was lost when the king was conned by an American fraudster, Jesse Bogdonoff. The money had been shifted to a bank account in San Francisco. The king was reported as saying that if the money was left in Tonga it would be spent on roads.

The late ‘Akilisi Pohiva helped expose the king’s corrupt practices, forced it to admit the illegality of the passport sales and change the constitution.

Pohiva and the then Catholic Bishop (now Cardinal) Patelesio Finau led 2500 protestors in a march on the royal palace where they presented petitions to the King asking him to cancel the citizenship of hundreds of passport holders and to sack the police minister who had accepted blame for the sales.

Veteran Pacific affairs reporter David Robie reported at the time that the king had told the Tonga Chronicle the kingdom could not afford to cancel the passports.

“He said changing foreign exchange rates, plus possible lawsuits by passport holders, meant that paying out refunds and declaring the documents null and void would be too heavy a burden for the country,” Robie wrote.

Candidate’s gifts a genuine attempt to help people says judge in rejecting bribery claims

By
Kaniva Staff
-

The Supreme Court has rejected claims of electoral bribery in the Tongatapu 1 electorate.

MP Tēvita Fatafehi Puloka

Judge Cooper, presiding, ruled that three claims of bribery against Tēvita Puloka, who won the seat, had not been proven.

The challenge was brought by Siaosi Vailahi Pōhiva, who stood unsuccessfully.

Pōhiva was the People’s Representative for Tongatapu I from 2019 until the last election. He is the eldest son of former Prime Minister ‘Akilisi Pōhiva.

Judge Cooper said Siaosi described himself as a fighter for democracy in Tonga and the Pacific.

Siaosi alleged that Puloka had given TP$100 to Toti Viau and Uili ‘Ahokava and donated soap –  sometimes referred to as hand sanitiser in the evidence – and face masks to different bodies or establishments.

Toti Viau,  from ‘Isileli in Kolomotu’a, said that she had seen Puloka  give to her mother, Vika Keke Tu’ipulotu, TP$100.

She said Puloka had visited her mother in September 2021 and left her an envelope containing the  money.

She stated that as he left, he told Vika not to forget that he was running for Parliament and had left, but not before leaving the envelope with money for her.

Toti said she went to her mother, who had “a sad face” and asked why Puloka would try to buy her vote.

Judge Cooper said he formed the opinion after her cross-examination that she was not a reliable witness and was motivated against Puloka.

When questioned she accepted that Puloka had done much for her and her family, but would give no credence to other suggestions of kindness.

“From this I judged she had an agenda to follow and it was not based on the obvious good deeds and generosity she acknowledged he had shown her,” the judge said.

“Her answers showed an erratic grasp of how to report facts.

“She was the only witness of this alleged bribery.  The petitioner has not proved his case under the head of claim.”

Judge Cooper said there were questions about the dates given in the alleged bribery of Uili ‘Ahokava and the circumstances relating to the event. The judge said ‘Ahokava had  been influenced in his testimony and had lied on oath.

“In any event, it becomes impossible to accept his word when he states that Puloka gave him the money to buy his vote and not just as a hand-out to family for some alcoholic drink,” the judge said.

The allegation was therefore not proven.

On the third allegation, the judge said that a candidate for election may make a payment or valuable gift for mixed motives.

“He may, for instance, make a gift for charitable purposes. There is nothing wrong with that. But he may also make a gift to buy votes. That is bribery,” he said.

“Tonga faced a new situation. The Covid 19, the coronavirus, was at last detected in the Kingdom at this time we are concerned with. One can say that the gift was close to the election and it was unprecedented, but so was the apparent finding of a case of Covid 19.

“Returning to the instant case, these were donations to children and teachers; the children in the main, the unvaccinated population of Tonga. Soldiers and Police also were the recipients.

“To put it another way, I am sure that the respondent has proved that they were proper recipients, so tending to demonstrate it was a charitable gift, as, though close to the election, so was the reported emergence of the virus in our community.

“There was nothing dishonest or corrupt in the donation of soap and masks. In fact, the reverse, it appears to me that this was nothing short of laudable and a genuine wish to help the people of Tonga.

“I find these acts were not bribery. Accordingly, I find all three allegations of bribery have failed to be proven.”

Another election result cancelled as Moeaki found guilty of bribery in Tongatapu 4 contest

By
Kaniva Staff
-

Yet another election outcome has been declared void after the Supreme Court found Tatafu Moeaki guilty of two offences of bribery under section 21 of the Electoral Act.

Māteni Tapueluelu (L), Tatafu Moeaki

Moeaki was found guilty after the court heard a petition from Mateni Tapueluelu who stood unsuccessfully against Moeaki in the contest for the Tongatapu 4 constituency, which comprises Ma’ufanga, Houmakelikao, Fangaloto, ‘Anana, ‘Umusi, Popua, Patangata, Tukutonga, Pangaimotu and Siesia.

At the time of the election on November 18, 2021, Tapueluelu held the seat and Moeaki was Minister of Labour, Commerce and Industries.

Moeaki won the election.

Tapueluelu asked the Supreme Court to overturn the result on the grounds that Moeaki had committed bribery by the following methods:

Giving TP$100 to one Nikisoni Tomasi, an elector of Tongatapu 4, to induce him to vote for him;

Making promises to procure loans for a group of female electors at Patangata to induce them to vote for him;

Making promises through another person to give free plastic water tanks to electors of Patangata to induce them to vote for him;

Making promises through another person to electors at Patangata that he would build dwelling houses for them for a sum ofTP $3000 per house to induce them to vote for him;

Making promises through another person to upgrade the roads in the electorate to induce the electors to vote for him.

Section 21 (1) Electoral Act says that every person commits the offence of bribery who, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person on his behalf gives any money or valuable gift to or for any elector, or to or for any other person on behalf of any elector or to or for any other person, in order to induce any elector to vote or refrain from voting.

A reference to giving, lending, agreeing to give or lend, offering, promising or promising to procure or try to procure, any money or valuable gift fell under this category.

In his defence, Moeaki said he had given TP$100 to Nikisoni Tomasi, but it was without any intention to induce him to vote for him.

He denied that he had promised to procure a loan for anybody.

He said he did not make any promise to procure a water tank for anybody.

He did not promise to build a house for anybody or promise to upgrade any road to induce the electors to vote for him.

After the evidence for both sides were given and his lawyer had filed his submissions Tapueluelu withdrew the allegations that Moeaki had promised to build houses and upgrade roads

Justice Niu, presiding, said that after considering the evidence he found the first claim had been proved.

“I consider that the petitioner has proved, and I am satisfied on the balance of probability, that the respondent gave TP$100 to Nikisoni Tomasi to induce Nikisoni Tomasi to vote for him,” the judge said.

“I find that the third claim has been proved, and I am satisfied on the balance of probability that the respondent committed bribery by making promises through another person to give plastic water tank to electors of Patangata to induce them to vote for him.

Because it had been proved to the satisfaction of this Court that Tatafu Moeaki was guilty of two offences of bribery under section 21 of the Electoral Act, and in pursuance of the provisions of section 32 of that Act, this Court declared that his election as the representative for the Tongatapu 4 Constituency was void.

Parliament meets to unseat Saulala and Tu‘i‘onetoa

By
Kaniva Staff
-

Two elected MPs whose seats in parliament had been declared void by the Supreme Court are expected to be officially unseated by the Legislative Assembly after next week on May 16.

Sangster Saulala and Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa

Lord Chief Justice Whitten found Sangster Saulala guilty of bribery following a complaint by Paula Piukala, who stood unsuccessfully in the election.

Saulala was appointed Minister of Internal Affairs by the incoming government.

Judge Nicholas Cooper declared former Prime Minister Dr. Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa’s election to Tongatapu number 10 Electoral District last year void.

Mr Cooper said Dr. Tu’i’onetoa had committed bribery in breach of Section 1 (a) of the Electoral Act 1989.

Confirming the Parliament will meet to remove the duo, the Chief Clerk  said:  ”Ater The Lord Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, Lord Fakafanua, received two Court Certifications on 2 May 2022, which confirmed that the elections in the 18 November 2021 General Election of the respective Parliamentary Representatives for Tongatapu 10, Pohiva Tuʻiʻonetoa, and Tongatapu 7, Sione Sangster Saulala, have been voided by the Supreme Court of Tonga. This is the outcome of judgements on respective election petitions that were brought against Tuʻiʻonetoa and Saulala on charges of bribery”.

The move was part of a requirement under the Electoral Act, it said.

“The unseating will be carried out at the Assembly’s meeting to be held on 16 May 2022. Once unseated, the seats in Parliament for Tongatapu 10 and Tongatapu 7 will be vacant. The Lord Speaker will then issue writs for election of new Representatives for Tongatapu 10 and Tongatapu 7.

“The date for the election of the new Representatives for the two constituencies will be determined by the Electoral Commission in consultation with the Speaker”.

Attorney General cites privilege as reason for not revealing advice on Lord Sevele to Cabinet

By
Kalino Latu
-

Attorney General Linda Folaumoetu’i has refused to reveal what advice her office gave to Cabinet about the appointment of Lord Sevele to the Reserve Bank of Tonga.

Attorney General Linda Folaumoetu’i. Photo/TBC

She said all advice provided by the Attorney General’s Office was privileged. 

“This legal solicitor-client professional privilege protects all communications between us and our clients from being disclosed to any person unless our client agrees to such disclosure,” she said.

“This is a long standing principle of law.”

She also declined to say what advice was given about speculation that Lord Sevele’s appointment might lead to a conflict of interest as outlined in items 88 to  96 of the Cabinet Manual and the Reserve Bank Act.

Kaniva News also raised concerns with the Attorney General about Lord Sevele’s involvement in the illegal transfer of millions of pa’anga  from a Chinese loan to Princess Pilolevu, his part in purchasing the MV Ashika which sank, killing 74 people and his refusal to pay back his share of the Chinese loan for the reconstruction of Nuku’alofa. 

The Attorney General said these were “mere allegations” because they had not been adjudicated before a Court of law and proven to be true.

Minister of Finance Tatafu Moeaki

“When court/tribunal judgments are delivered on the alleged issues, then appropriate authorities, including Cabinet, can take into considerations those conviction records in determining whether a person is fit and proper to be considered as a member of a statutory board or otherwise,” she said.

Kaniva comment

As Kaniva News has reported, the process for appointing directors to the Reserve Bank does not have to go through the Public Service Commission so that their background has to be scrutinised using the Cabinet guidelines and the Reserve Bank Act. The selection of the board directors is at the discretion of the Minister for Finance and Cabinet.

As we have said previously when we reported on the relationship between the former Prime Minister Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa and convicted fraudster and Cabinet Minister Akosita Lavulavu, ministerial discretion means Cabinet ministers have the power to make a choice about whether to act or not act, to approve or not approve, or to approve with conditions taking into account all relevant information.

The Minister for Finance has access to all the relevant information about Sevele’s involvement in a number of controversial actions. Some people might well think that the Minister had enough information to a decision in good conscience not to appoint Lord Sevele.

Clearly a segment of the public is concerned that a person with a highly controversial background may sit on the board of the kingdom’s most important financial institution. Such strong public reaction to the appointment would likely have an effect in countries such as New Zealand.

Lord Sevele

Section 10 of the NRBT Act says that in the appointment of directors, Minister and Cabinet as well as the board must – “give regard to a person’s recognised integrity …….” The question that continues to be raised, as a matter of proper public debate, is whether Lord Sevele’s integrity has been recognised to be of such a standard as to make it proper for him to be appointed to the NRBT board. 

So what is to be done? Perhaps Attorney General Linda Folaumoetu’i is correct when she says that many of the allegations and concerns have not been tested in court.

Here is what she said: “When court/tribunal judgments are delivered on the alleged issues, then appropriate authorities, including Cabinet, can take into considerations those conviction records in determining whether a person is fit and proper to be considered as a member of a statutory board or otherwise.”

So let the Cabinet set up a public tribunal where these issues can be aired and investigated properly. Let there be a proper, public enquiry on Lord Sevele and, in the future, on all Cabinet appointments that would otherwise avoid scrutiny. If a public enquiry declares there is no substance in the concerns about his appointment, let Lord Sevele take up his seat on the board. If an enquiry goes against him, however, he should not be appointed and that should be the end of the matter.

Saulala loses Tongatapu 7 as Supreme Court finds  bribery proven, voids election results

By
Kaniva Staff
-

Sione Sangster Saulala, who won the Tongatapu 7 seat in the last election, has joined former Prime Minister Pohiva Tu’I’onetoa  in having his election annulled by the Supreme Court.

Minister of Internal Affairs Sangstar Saulala. Photo/Supplied

Lord Chief Justice Whitten found Salala guilty of bribery following a complaint by Paula Piukala, who stood unsuccessfully in the election.

Saulala was appointed Minister of Internal Affairs by the incoming government.

Mr Piukala alleged that:

On September 28 2021 Saulala gave Hengihengi Kolo, of Tofoa, $100.

On November 16 last year Saulala gave $20 and a box of chicken to ‘Ahio  Tauelangi of Pea and others.

On November 10 indirectly gave, via his wife,  a bag of groceries to ‘Ahio Tauelangi.

Some time before November 8, Saulala asked the then Prime Minister for help with his campaign by bringing forward Government planned roadworks in the area between Pea and Tokomololo, which works were undertaken in the first half of November 2021.

Piukala said that in each instance, Saulala did so in order to induce the recipients of the money or gifts to vote for him.

Lord Chief Justice Whitten found the first and second claims proved and as a result, Saulala was found guilty of bribery at the election.

Accordingly, Saulala’s election on November 18 was declared void.

The court awarded costs against Saulala.

In the first claim, Hengihengi Kolo said in a deposition that on September 28 last year Saulala gave him TP$100 in two TP$50 notes at tyre repair shop in Tofoai. After discussing the elections  Hengihengi and Saulala shook hands. Hengihengi said he felt something placed in his hand. He looked and saw that Saulala had put money in his hand. Hengihengi asked him what it was for. Saulala told him that the money may be of assistance to his family and reminded Hengihengi to remember him during the election. Hengihengi told Saulala to take his money, but Mr Saulala laughed and walked over to his vehicle, insisting that Hengihengi keep it.

The judge ruled that the first claim had been proven

With regards to the second claim, ‘Ahio Tauelangi said that on November 16, 2021, while he was speaking with some other people, Saulala’s vehicle stopped, and he joined the conversation. He told them that he went to drop off a box of chicken to the community police at Tokomololo. Saulala then offloaded a box of chicken for ‘Ahio and the others to distribute amongst themselves. Just before he left Saulala gave ‘Ahio a TP$20 note. When ‘Ahio tried to return it, Saulala insisted that he keep it for ‘anything he wanted to buy’ and then drove off.

‘Asaloni Tamale, who was present during the incident,  told the court ’Ahio did not want the chicken. ‘Asaloni interpreted ‘Ahio’s remark as him not wanting the chicken because it was “meant only to buy his vote.”

The court found the second claim had been proven,

In regard to the third claim, Piukala claimed that Saulala’s wife gave valuable gifts in the form of bags of groceries and shopping to people in Pea, including ‘Ahio Tauelangi’s family, within three months of the election. Tauelangi said that on November 10 his grandchildren told him that Saulala’s wife Kilistina was visiting with plastic bags of groceries.

Saulala denied that the groceries his wife gave to ‘Ahio were from him or on his behalf. He deposed that his wife was one of the distributors of the groceries on the date in question on behalf of a local organisation and that the groceries fall into the same category as the assistance he and his wife had been giving ‘Ahio over the years.

The third claim was found not proven.

In terms of the fourth claim Tevita Faletau gave evidence about roadworks performed in the first half of November 2021 at the area of Pea up to the border with Tokomololo. He said that Mema Latu, whom he described as Saulala’s “campaign agent in Tokomololo” told him that the road work was done by the Government “to render support” for Saulala’s election campaign. Tevita said that he supported Saulala in the elections because of what Mema had told him.

Latu said the roadworks were already on the repair program of the Ministry of Infrastructure although the timing of the repairs was uncertain. Saulala had asked the Prime Minister to bring the work forward which the Government agreed to do. Latu said he asked Saulala to ask the Prime Minister to bring the roadworks forward because he knew the works had been scheduled, but had been delayed. He considered that, as Deputy Chairman of the Tokomololo Community Council, it was his responsibility to make the request. Mema denied that the works were done to support Mr Saulala’s campaign.

Saulala denied making the request in order to ”court the favour of the voters” in that area. He said that he did not receive a response to his request and that the works “were just done.” He suggested that his request may have been granted because he “was respected as a previous Minister.”

The fourth claim was rejected.

As a result of the first and second claims having been proved, Saulala was found guilty of bribery at the election.

“Accordingly, it is hereby declared that the election of Sione Sangster Saulala as the representative of the Tongatapu 7 constituency, is void,” Lord Chief Justice Whitten said.

If I had wanted to buy votes I would have made sure they got the money, former PM tells court, but judge says bribery occurred, voids election

By
Philip Cass
-
Prime MInister Dr Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa. Photo/Kalino Lātū (Kaniva News)

If he had wanted to buy votes he would have ensured they got the money, former Prime Minister Dr. Pohiva Tu’i’onetoa told the Supreme Court.

Defending himself against allegations that TP$50,000 had been offered to a women’s group as a bribe, Dr. Tu’i’onetoa described it as a “misunderstanding.”

The Supreme Court has declared former Prime Minister Dr. Pohiva Tu’i’onetoa’s election to Tongatapu number 10 Electoral District last year  void.

Judge N.J.Cooper said Dr. Tu’i’onetoa had committed bribery in breach of Section 1 (a) of the Electoral Act 1989.

Section 21 (1) Electoral Act says that every person commits the offence of bribery who, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person on his behalf gives any money or valuable gift to or for any elector, or to or for any other person on behalf of any elector or to or for any other person, in order to induce any elector to vote or refrain from voting.

A reference to giving, lending, agreeing to give or lend, offering, promising or promising to procure or try to procure, any money or valuable gift fell under this category.

A petition was brought to the court by Kelekolio Taniela Kiu, who stood unsuccessfully for the election, challenging the result and alleging that Dr. Tu’i’onetoa committed two acts of bribery.

Kiu sought to have the election declared void.

On October 1, 2021 there was an event at Houmaniutao to showcase the handicrafts of the Women’s Association of Tongatapu 10.

Guests included Dr. Tu’i’onetoa, the then Prime Minister and Minister for Public Enterprises and leader of the Paati ‘a e Kakai; the People’s Party, and also the Minister for Finance, Tevita Lavemaau.

Kiu claimed that TP$50,000 was offered to the Women’s Group of Tongatapu on behalf of Dr. Tu’i’onetoa to influence voters.

Witnesses in support of Kiu said that at the entrance to the Niutao event one of the Prime Minister’s banners was displayed. Political pamphlets were handed out.

The group had previously approached the government for financial help, but been told there was no money, so the announcement of a grant of TP$50,000 by Hon. Lavemaau was greeted with shock.

Some witnesses regarded the event itself as well as the announcement of the money as political campaigning.

They were suspicious that there was in fact no money because there was no systems for grants in place and could take up to a year for applications for grants to be processed and paid.

One of the witnesses, Mele ‘Amanaki,  secretary general for the Public Services Association and interim Secretary General of the Seven Sector Association, which represent the interests of groups including fisheries, livestock, handicrafts, tapa making and roadside vendors.

She said the Minister for Finance said the cheque would be sent the following week.

Members of the Handicraft Association had complained to her and she checked the budget. She told them there was nothing there and that the Minister had obviously been lying.

On October 28 Hon. Lavemaau made another speech in which it was stated that conditions had to be met and that the organisation would need aims and a budget and a timeline to fulfil them by.

He said it was not his duty at the Lapaha event to provide all the details, nor was it important for him personally to do so.

He insisted many other groups had received funds, but when asked could not name a single one.

In his defence, the former Prime Minister said he had no idea what the Finance Minister was going to say, so he had no reason to discuss that speech with him. He was being spontaneous and showing his warmth.

He was always under the impression that the women’s group  knew how a grant worked. If he wanted to buy their votes he would have insured, they got the money.

Had they approached him directly he would have been aware of any issues; of any misunderstanding. He did not simply let Mr. Lavemaau mislead the people. Silence on his part was not his endorsing what Mr. Lavemaau said.

The money had to come in the form of a grant and he had assumed it had been paid. The first time he suspected that was not so, was when he was served the petition. Then he understood there had been a misunderstanding.

‘Afā wharf

The second case involved the opening of the ‘Afā Wharf

Witnesses who were at the opening of the wharf said they heard the former Prime Minster say he had made the wharf happen and asked the people present to vote for him because of this.

Dr. Tu’i’onetoa agreed he asked for votes at the opening in his speech. The work he did was something the public could trust him about.

Witnesses told the court the ‘Afā wharf had been made a priority  by the government. Because of shortages of materials and Covid restrictions, workmen had to labour around the clock to finish the project. The court was told the directions about completing the wharf, including the deadline for completion and opening,  came from the Prime Minister’s office.

Work on the project was carried out by the Ports Authority, despite a warning from the  Solicitor General that its involvement was  unlawful because the Authority had no remit in relation to the outer islands ports.

Judge Cooper found that the offer of TP$50,000 constituted a bribe because it sought to influence a clearly defined group of people. The construction of the wharf benefitted everybody in Tongatapu 10 and beyond and so did not constitute bribery.

“I make a declaration that in accordance with the findings in this judgement Dr. Pohiva Tu’i’onetoa committed bribery on one occasion in breach of section 1 (a) of the Electoral Act 1989,” Judge Cooper said.

“In respect of this, pursuant to section 32 of the Electoral Act 1989 1 make a declaration that the election of Dr. Pohiva Tu’i’onetoa on 18th November 2021 as the People’s Representative for the Tongatapu number 10 Electoral District is void.

“Pursuant to section 37 of the Electoral Act 1989 1 shall forthwith certify this result to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly.”

Disgraced former PM Pōhiva Tu‘i‘onetoa loses seat through electoral petition: reports

By
Kaniva Staff
-

Tongatapu 10 Member of Parliament, former Prime Minister Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa, has lost his seat in Parliament after a Supreme Court decision this afternoon.

Former Prime Minister Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa (L) outside court this afternoon after Justice Cooper announced his decision. Photo/Supplied

He has been found guilty of alleged bribery and corruption and his 2021 election victory was declared null and void, according to local news media reports.

Kaniva News is expected to report the full verdict by Justice Nicholas Cooper when the copy of the judgement becomes officially available.

The court decision came after Tu’i’onetoa was dumped by majority of his former Cabinet ministers leaving him to unsuccessfully fight to retain his premiership seat in December.

The court decision today also came after Justice Copper sent former MP and Cabinet Minister ‘Etuate Lavulavu and his wife, former Cabinet Minister and MP ‘Akosita Lavulavu to jail for fraud.

Tu’i’onetoa had been strongly accused of being too close with ‘Etuate while Tu’i’onetoa was Prime Minister.  

‘Etuate told media he was the one who masterminded Tu’i’onetoa’s successful campaign to become prime minister.

Ironically, Tu’i’onetoa’s losing his seat was the latest after ‘Etuate was disqualified as MP by a Supreme Court decision in 2016. He was found guilty of electoral bribery and corruptions and later dismissed as Cabinet Minister.

Chinese company’s aviation hub plans for Solomon Islands

By
Kaniva Staff
-

This story by ABC appeared on RNZ.co.nz. Kaniva News  collaborates with RNZ.

One of China’s largest defence and aerospace companies promised to upgrade almost three dozen airstrips in Solomon Islands as part of an ambitious plan to transform the Pacific Islands country into an “aeronautical hub” for the region.Airlines Airbus A320 lands at Munda airport, Western Province, Solomon Islands.

Solomon Airlines’ current sole international aircraft, an Airbus A320. Photo: lasafotografix

In return, the Solomon Islands government said it would purchase six aircraft from AVIC Commercial Aircraft, a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned defence behemoth which has built small and medium-sized aeroplanes to be sold to developing countries.

The proposed exchange was laid out two-and-a-half years ago in a memorandum of understanding (MOU), which has been obtained by the ABC.

The document was signed by Solomon Islands Minister for Communication and Aviation Peter Shanel Agovaka at Yanliang, near Xi’an in central China, in November 2019, only a few months after the Pacific Island country switched diplomatic recognition to Beijing from Taiwan.

Chinese state media reported that the minister also delivered an address at a major aviation conference which AVIC hosted in Yanliang, hailing cooperation with the company as an “opportunity and way forward” for Solomon Islands.

However, it does not appear that either AVIC or the Solomon Islands government pushed ahead with any of the initiatives in the MOU after signing it.

Solomon Airlines chief executive unaware of deal

Solomon Airlines currently operates only one international aircraft – an Airbus A320 – and has not moved to buy any new planes from the Chinese firm.

It runs three smaller Twin Otter and one Dash 8 aircraft for domestic routes.

When the ABC contacted the chief executive of Solomon Airlines, Brett Gebers, he said he was unaware of the agreement.

“I discussed this MOU with the board and, as it has not yet been presented to the board, the chairman said that he will contact the MCA [Ministry of Communication and Aviation] to find out more about it,” he told the ABC.

“I was half-heartedly invited to accompany a group of MPs to China around this time in 2019 but nothing ever came of it. There was mention of looking at aeroplanes.”

That stands in stark contrast to the sweeping vision laid out in the MOU, which declares: “Solomon [Islands] wishes to be part of the regional airline concept where Honiara would receive direct flights from China and become a regional hub.”

“For this vision, Solomon [Islands] needs to acquire new planes, such as MA600/MA700 and Y-12 aircraft and refurbish airfields,” it said.

The MA600 is a relatively new turboprop plane which AVIC Commercial Aircraft has already sold to a number of countries, including Laos and Benin.

The MOU said the sale would “depend on the further negotiations on price and concessional terms” and would require “ultimate approval of the board of Solomon Islands and the government of Solomon Islands”.

The MOU also laid out an ambition to upgrade almost three dozen airstrips across Solomon Islands, and said the purchase of planes would be “in combination and is linked to facilitating the upgrade of Solomon Islands domestic airfields in two phases.

“For Phase One, up to 15 airfields; for Phase Two, the remaining 20 airfields”.

But again, there is no evidence that any of this work has begun.

Covid-19 may have stalled plans

The MOU was one of six agreements signed by Solomon Islands and China in the aftermath of Honiara’s decision to abandon its relationship with Taiwan and establish diplomatic ties with Beijing.

Earlier this month, China and Solomon Islands announced they had signed a security pact, stoking regional fears that Beijing might be intent on establishing a military presence in the Pacific Island nation.

Graeme Smith from the Australian National University told the ABC there was a “great deal of urgency in the [aviation] agreement … far more urgency than you find in many MOUs between China and the Pacific”.

He said the plan likely stalled because of the pandemic, which smashed the global airline industry and shut down most air travel into both countries.

“I suspect mainly what stopped it from happening is Covid-19, because it was signed in November 2019 [just before the pandemic] and all the time lines … would have gone quickly out of the window,” he said.

“The requirements for this agreement to kick in would have required both a visit to China by the Solomon Islands side and a visit to Solomon Islands from the Chinese side, both of which would have been very difficult to manage after February 2020.”

Dr Smith said AVIC may have sensed a commercial opportunity to sell planes to Solomon Islands on favourable terms which were effectively subsidised by Chinese state financial institutions.

But he said there was also a clear “strategic push” animating the MOU.

“In the first instance, this is a state-owned enterprise responding to a signal from its government to do things that are strategically in line with China’s goals,” he said.

Dr Smith believed it was also worth noting that AVIC’s commercial arm was deeply intertwined with the Chinese military, which might have an interest in scoping out airfields and other facilities in Solomon Islands.

“Defence planners (in Australia) might be somewhat concerned at the involvement of this company. I think their concerns might be how readily information could be conveyed back to the Chinese military through this commercial enterprise,” he said.

“But we’re getting into the realm of speculation. Is this company going to build a base in Solomon Islands? Probably not, it’s not really what they do. But certainly, they have extremely strong ties to the Chinese military.”

Several countries are already working on airport infrastructure in Solomon Islands.

Australia and New Zealand have agreed to upgrade runways on Taro Island near Choiseul Bay and Seghe Airport on the New Georgia Islands, while New Zealand has previously funded airport upgrades at the towns of Munda and Gizo.

Japan and the World Bank are also currently funding an upgrade of the runway of Honiara International Airport.

The ABC has tried repeatedly to contact both Agovaka and AVIC Commercial Aircraft for comment, but neither have yet responded.

–ABC

Tonga: NZ medical team notices signs of post-traumatic stress disorder

By
Kaniva Staff
-

By Fīnau Fonua of RNZ.co.nz and is republished with permission.

Mental health is a concern in Tonga, as the country’s struggle to recover from the January volcanic eruption has been made even more difficult by the current Covid-19 restrictions. New Zealand’s Pacific Medical Association says that people are starting to show signs of post-traumatic stress disorder.

The Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption was a one-in-1000-year disaster. The resulting tsunami and ash cloud fallout have devastated the Kingdom. Waves up to 15 metres high destroyed hundreds of homes and wiped out entire villages. Miraculously only three people were killed.

Misa and his team of mental health specialists have been in Tonga since March 30 to assist with humanitarian efforts. His team focuses on training nurses and social workers for mental health rehabilitation, an area of health that is underdeveloped in Tonga.

“So far, we have delivered six training sessions with 134 participants, 99 online and 34 face to face. We provide support to the NGO and counselling services,” said Misa.PACMAT nurse Mary-Rose Muller with children from Mango Island

PACMAT nurse Mary-Rose Muller with children from Mango Island Photo: Supplied

“We teach techniques in breathing, getting enough sleep, exercise and talking therapies.

“Mental well-being is something that is not freely talked about in Tonga because you’re expected to be strong. Just pray and you’re expected to be fine. I teach them that our mental well-being like our physical well-being is real. You can be physically all right but mentally unwell. Stress does not discriminate, it affects everybody.”

Misa said the Hunga Tonga Hunga Ha’apai eruption was a highly traumatic event that caused huge amounts of stress and anxiety. He said there have been signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, particularly in children who suffer panic attacks triggered by loud sounds, reminiscent of the volcanic explosion.

According to Nasa, the sound was so loud that it could be heard from as far away as Alaska.

“They described it as deafening, and it triggered a lot of stress and anxiety,” he said.

“Every time there is thunder, kids would cover their ears, and run and hide. Look for a table or something to hide under. Like the kids will be out playing but as soon as there is thunder, their life is no longer there.”

This stress has been further exacerbated by the recent outbreak of Covid-19. Tonga has been under lockdown since February with heavy restrictions on movement and business closures, Misa said.

“The people are already traumatised by the event of January 15 and now you have Covid-19 which has ordered more stress. People get that the Ministry of Health is just trying to contain Covid-19 to protect our vulnerable, but it doesn’t take away the fact that it is a mental challenge.”PACMAT nurse Seini Faleata in a therapy talk with women from Atata,

PACMAT nurse Seini Faleata in a therapy talk with women from Atata, Photo: Supplied

“Stress is inevitable so you have to learn how to manage it instead of reacting to it inappropriately. Sitting idle during lockdown makes you vulnerable.”

Nuku’alofa Rotary Assistant Governor, Peter Paulsen, echoed Misa’s observations.

Paulsen has been coordinating donations from Rotaries around the world. He said that the disaster had a traumatic effect, especially in the days following the eruption.

“We have sliding doors in the house and it creates a slight rumbling sound reminiscent of the explosion. Whenever I’d open the door, people downstairs would say ‘is that you Peter?’ to make sure it’s me and not the volcano.”

“There was a definite sensitivity. About nine days after the explosion, there was a day of heavy thunder and several people rang me to confirm that the sounds in the sky were thunder and not an eruption, because I live by the coastline where the horizon over the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano is visible.

Stress shows in many ways and different degrees. You notice your ability to process information, to think things through it affected,” Paulsen said.

1...224225226...904Page 225 of 904
© Copyright 2025 Kaniva Tonga News & Entertainment