Home Blog Page 381

OPINION: PM uses constitution to defend his failure to take action against convicted Ha’apai governor

OPINION: Prime Minister Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa has used the Constitution to defend his failure to take action against the Governor of Ha’apai after he was found guilty of unlawful possession of turtle meat.

Tu’i’onetoa has cited Clauses 23, 54 and 55 to justify not taking action.

Kaniva News believes the Prime Minister’s argument is flawed and that  Clause 54 of the Constitution outlines his powers, while Clause 55 underlines the Governor’s legal and Constitutional obligations. Clause 23 is a power given to the judiciary to make sure a person who is convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to imprisonment for more than two years would not become a minister or governor.

PM has more power 

We believe the Prime Minister is wrong because clause 54 has given him more power over his ministers and governors no matter how significant or insignificant the offences they have committed, than the power clause 23 has given to the judiciary.

Tu’i’onetoa  told Parliament he would not take action against Governor Viliami Hingano Manuopangai after  the Governor was convicted and sentenced in the Supreme Court for breaching a law Manuopangai is obliged to ensure his people do not break.

Manuopangai, who was  MP for Ha’apai No 12 until 2015, has been spoken of as a candidate for the Prime Minister’s PAK party to challenge sitting Democrat MP Mo’ale Finau at the next election.

Innocent until proven guilty

The Prime Minister has already clearly laid out the house rule for his ministers or governors and said the key for dismissing them if they misbehaved was the principle of being presumed innocent until found guilty.

He meant that if a Cabinet minister or governor became involved in serious allegations or court case he would only act against them if they were convicted by the courts.

Governor Manuopangai was found guilty and fined TOP$20,500 in the Supreme Court of unlawful possesion of 198 kg of turtle, but Tu’i’onetoa said the Constitution did not allow him to sack Manuopangai.

Attempt to divert attention

Tu’i’onetoa also told Parliament the government would not interfere with the judiciary, and that the Governor was free to lodge an appeal within 42 days after his sentence. He was sentenced on May 19.

The Prime Minister urged Parliament last week not to disobey the Constitution or leave the law aside because of their own personal opinions towards Manuopangai.

However, his plea could be seen as an  attempt to divert attention from the fact that he has a responsibility to respond to the governor’s conviction appropriately.

Clauses 23 and 54 are independent 

Clauses 23 and 54 are two separate powers given by the Constitution to the judiciary and the Prime Minister. The most important point here is that it appears the Prime Minister can recommend the dismissal of the governor at any time. The provisions of Clause 23 do not appear to prevent the Prime Minister from dismissing or forcing a governor or a minister to resign.

Kaniva News believes the Prime Minister’s reasoning for not taking any action is misguided. Any action taken by the Prime Minister with respect of a conviction would be justified by Clause 54, which it does not clash with Clause 23.

Clause 54 says: “The King shall appoint Governors to Ha’apai and Vava’u on the advice of the Prime Minister.” This means the power to dismiss the governor rests with the Prime Minister and the king’s prerogatives.

Conscience issue

It is also a matter on which the Prime Minister must use his conscience.

Although Tonga’s Parliament does not formally accept conscience and pragmatic approaches in a legal sense, technically such issues can arise. Even when we might expect them to vote as a block, nobles and people’s representatives have voted according to their conscience rather than on party lines, on certain issues.

Most of the Cabinet Ministers in the past included ministers who resigned according to their conscience did so because they did not want their continuation in the post to cause further distractions.

No interference with judiciary

If the Prime Minister stood down Governor Manuopangai temporarily while he was filing an appeal, such a decision would not be seen as interfering with the judiciary. One power lies with the Prime Minister, the other with the courts.

Governor’s role model

Kaniva News believes that Manuopangai has breached his constitutional obligation to enforce the law to his Ha’apai people.

The Prime Minister appears to have ignored the fact that Clause 55 clearly tells us that the sole  responsibility of governors is to ensure their people follow the law. He has not made a case for keeping Governor Manuopangai in office, when his duty is to tell the people of Ha’apai, whose livelihood relies on fishing, to follow the law on turtle meat – a law he has been found to have broken.

The best thing for the Prime Minister to do is to stand down Manuopangai and let him appeal his conviction. If he is acquitted he may be re-appointed  – on Hon. Tu’i’onetoa’s recommendation – by the king.

FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA NOUNOU

Kuo mahino ‘eni he’ikai pe fai ‘e Tu’i’onetoa ia ha me’a ki he kōvana Ha’apai hili hono tautea’i ia ‘i he fakamaau’anga’ ‘i hono maumau’i ‘o e lao ‘oku ‘uhinga ai ‘ene kōvana’ ke fakapapau’i ‘oku tauhi lao ‘a e kakai ‘o Ha’apai. Pea na’a’ ne fakahā ‘eni ‘i Fale Alea he uike kuo ‘osi’. ‘Oku faka’apa’apa’i pe ‘ene tu’utu’uni’ ka ‘i he taimi tatau ‘oku ‘i ai e ngafa ‘o e mitia’ ke sivisivi’i ene faka’uhinga’ pe ‘oku fai he ngaahi makatu’unga lelei, totonu mo taau pe ‘oku ‘ikai. Ko e vakai ‘a e Kaniva’ ‘i he fakamatala faka-e-fakakaukau (opinion)  ko ‘eni’ ‘oku ‘i ai ‘a e tōnounou mo e matavaivai lahi he faka’uhinga ‘a e palēmia’ pea ‘e lava pe ke mau pehē kuo’ ne takihala’i ‘a e Fale Alea’ mo e kakai ‘o e fonua’.  Kuo kalo e palēmia’ ki he kupu 23 e konisitūtone’ kae tuku e kupu 54 ‘oku ne foaki ‘a e mafai lukufua mo lahi ange ia he mafai ‘oku foaki ‘e he kupu 23 ki he fakamaau’anga’. Ko e kupu 54 ‘oku ne ma’u ai e mafai ke ne tauea’i ha minisitā ‘o tatau pe pe ko e hā e lahi hono tukuaki’i pe tautea he fakamaau’anga’. Ko e kupu 23  ‘oku fakangatangata pe ia ki ha taha kuo mo’ua ngāue pōpula  laka hake he ta’u ‘e ua’ pe lolotonga fai ha’ane tangi tuku kehe kapau kuo fakamolemole’i ‘e he tu’i’. Pea tokua ‘i he faka’uhinga ‘a Tu’i’onetoa ‘oku hao ai ‘a Manuopangai he na’e  ‘ikai foki mo’ua ngāue pōpula ia. Ka ko e me’a ‘oku vaivai ai e faka’uhinga ko ‘eni’  he ‘oku ‘ikai ‘aupito kaunoa ‘a e kupu 23 ia ‘i hono mafai (perogative) he kupu 55 ‘a ia kuopau ai ke ne pule ki hono fakanofo, tuku ki tu’a pe tautea’i ha’ane minisitā pe kōvana kuo tukuaki’i pe mo’ua ‘i ha’ane faihia. Ko e mafai kakato ia ‘oku ma’u ‘e he palēmia’ ta’e ha kākunga ki ai ‘a e fakamaau’anga’. Pea ‘oku foaki ia ‘e he konisitūtone’ ke vave ma’u pe ha’ane faitu’utu’uni ke fakapapau’i  ‘oku ‘ikai ma’u ‘a e fu’u vāhenga lahi mo  monū’ia ‘i he lakanga minisitā mo kōvana’  ‘e ha ni’ihi  lolotonga ‘oku fai e femamahi’aki mo e vālau ‘a e kau li tukuhau’ ‘i hanau tukuaki’i pe ‘ulungaanga ta’etaau pe maumau lao. Pea ‘i he keisi ‘a  Manuopangai, ‘oku lau ia ko e hia mamafa he kuo’ ne toe maumau’i pe ‘e ia ‘a e lao ‘oku tu’unga ai ‘ene hoko ko e kōvana’. ‘Oku hanga ‘e he keisi  ko ‘eni ‘o tesi ‘a e konisenisi mo’ui ‘o e palēmia’ mo e loloto e maama fakalotu mo e ako ‘oku’ ne ma’u’. ‘Oku taha mātē pe fatongia ‘o e kōvana’ ‘oku tala mai ‘e he konitūtone’ kupu 55. ‘A ia ko e pau ke ne fakapapau’i   ‘oku muimui ‘a hono kakai Ha’apai’ ki he tu’utu’uni ‘a e lao’. ‘E anga fēfē ke fakamālohi’i ‘e Manuopangai ‘a e kakai ‘o Ha’apai’ ke ‘oua na’a nau maumau’i ‘a e lao fekau’aki mo e kakano’i fonu’ lolotonga ia’ na’e mo’ua ia ‘i he’ene maumau’i ‘a e lao ko ia? Ko e fakamanatu pe ki he palēmia’ ko hono ngafa ke faitautea’ ‘oku ‘i he kupu 54 ia pea ‘oku ‘ikai ha kaunga ki ai ‘a e kupu 23. Ko e ongo mafai kehekehe ia ‘e ua ‘o ‘ikai ta’ofi ‘e ē ‘a ē. Pea kapau te ne fai hano tautea ‘o Manuopangai he taimi ni’ lolotonga ‘oku te’eki fai ‘ene hopo tangi ‘oku lau’ ‘e ‘ikai ‘aupito ha’ane uesia ‘e taha ‘ene tu’utu’uni ko ia’ ‘a e fakamaau’anga’ ai hangē ko ‘ene faka’uhinga ‘i Fale Alea’. Mole ke mama’o ke taku ko ha’ane kaunoa ia ‘i he fatongia ‘o e fakamaau’anga. ‘Oku hala ‘aupito e fo’i faka’uhinga ia ko ia. ‘Oku aata mai leva heni ‘a e fakakaukau ‘oku ‘ikai fai ‘ene tu’ut’uuni ko ‘eni ‘i ha ‘uhinga taau mo lelei mo e vakai atu a e kakai totongi tukuhau pea ‘oku ‘atā ai ki he kakai ‘o e fonua’ ke nau faka’uhinga’i pe ko hā  ‘oku kei vilitaki ai ‘a e palēmia’ ke malu’i ‘a e kōvana’. Kuo ‘i ai foki e vavalo ‘a ha ni’ihi ‘oku taumu’a ‘a e palēmia’ pea mo ‘ene paati PAK ke kemipeini’i ‘a Manuopangai ke hū ki Fale Alea mei Ha’apai he fili hoko’. Pea kapau ‘oku tonu e faka’uhinga ko ia’, pea ta ‘oku ‘ikai tokanga ‘a e palēmia’ ia ki he lelei ‘a e kakai li tukuhau’ mo hono tauhi malu ‘e he kakai ‘o Ha’apai’ ‘a e lao’ ka ko ‘ene lelei pe ia ‘a’ana tokotaha mo ‘ene paati fakapolitikale’.

Jargon to blame for confusion over govt’s traveller quarantine fees proposal; ‘don’t twist and spin’, warned Lord Tu‘iha‘angana

Lord Tu’iha’angana has warned the government in parliament to come clean and tell the public it was working on a proposal for travellers to pay their stay in managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ).

Minister of Health Dr ‘Amelia Tu’ipulotu (L), Lord Tu’iha’angana

The nobility MP said the government should give clear explanation about the proposal and avoid trying to mislead the public into believing there will be no such fees.

The noble also warned the government to be “transparent” saying the reality was that travellers are currently staying in MIQ free, while the government is working on a proposal to charge future passengers.

In Tongan Lord Tu’iha’angana said: “Mahino ia ‘oku te’eki ke totongi, ka ‘oku ‘i ai e fokotu’utu’u pehē pea ‘oku ou tui ko e fiema’u ia ko ē ‘ata kitu’a”.

Lord Tu’iha’angana also said:  “Kae ‘oua ‘e toe takai pehē mai, hangē ko ē ‘oku toe ki’i vilovilo holo, ha’u hangatonu pē ke mahino ‘oku te’eki ai ke charge ‘a e 4 afe ka ‘oku fai e ngāue ki ai ‘a e Komiti ko ē pea ‘e toki ha’u faka’osi”.

In English this means:

“Do not spin and twist it, just come straight so that it is clear the $4,000 fees are yet to be charged but a committee is working on it before a final decision”.

Lord Tu’iha’angana was responding after what appears to be the Minister of Health’s failure to give a straight answer to a straight question from Ha’apai 13 MP after he asked her to clarify the “proposal”.

In Tongan MP Mo’ale Finau said: “Ko e ki’i konga ‘e taha ‘i he health ‘Eiki Sea. Ko e ki’i me’a pē eni ia ‘Eiki Sea ‘oku ki’i hamumu ai ‘a e motu’a ni. Ko e fo’i konga ko ē ‘o e 4000. Na’e pehē foki ‘aneafi na’e ‘ikai ke fai ha fakakaukau pehē pea hangē ‘oku ki’i malohi mai ‘Eiki Sea e me’a ni ia hangē ia ‘oku ha’uha’u pē ki’i fo’i fokotu’u ia ke ‘alu ki he Kapineti.

In English this means:

“One thing about Health Mr Speaker. Something I am concerned about. The part about the $4,000. Yesterday it was said there was no such idea but Mr Speaker it’s becoming clear now the proposal is likely to go to Cabinet”.

In her response, instead of clarifying the proposal, the Minister of Health Dr ‘Amelia Tu’ipulotu  began by saying the government is not charging repatriated travelers with such fees. But that was not the question. She was asked to clarify Finau’s concern about the proposal.

The minister’s answer in the first place appears to show she was attempting to avoid being straightforward. And instead of using the word “fokotu’u” the English word for proposal she used the word “kaveinga ko ‘eni”, which it can be interpreted in English to refer to – this issue.

And instead of clearly saying a government committee was being tasked with revising the quarantine fees and expenses, she said it was a small committee, “ki’i kōmiti si’i”.

“But it has yet to be submitted to Cabinet,” Dr Tu’ipulotu said in Tongan of the proposal.

The Prime Minister claimed in parliament he was just made aware of the proposal after he read it in an email, apparently, an email by CEO Ma’u to Kaniva News on Wednesday last week confirming the proposal in which the Prime Minister was copied. Tu’i’onetoa said there was no decision made yet, “te’eki ke fai ha tu’utu’uni pau”.

As we reported last week and today, Communication (MEIDECC) CEO Paula Ma’u has confirmed to us last week the proposal is currently underway for passengers to pay their stay in MIQ from their own pockets.

He previously said in a press release the work to create the proposal was endorsed by the National Emergency Management Committee and National Committee for Covid-19.

He said when the proposal is completed it will be submitted to the two committees and if they approve it the proposal will then go to Cabinet for final decision.

Ma’u said the proposal was initiated after the costs for the managed isolation facilities were too expensive for the government to pay.

The planned quarantine fee was raised in parliament last week by former Minister of Health Saia Piukala. The Minister of Finance denied it.

The proposal has sparked heated debates online with critics calling on the government to withdraw it.

Critics argued that the Tongan returnees were people who got stuck overseas because of Covid-19 and most of them were on visitor’s visas.

They said this was not a good proposal for people who returned from New Zealand and Australian seasonal worker programmes because the quarantine fees would be an equivalent of the wages they earned after working up to eight weeks in the farms.

 

Health Minister reiterates govt’s ‘proposal’ for travelers to pay  thousands for Tonga quarantine facilities

The Minister of Health once again told parliament yesterday the government is working on a proposal for travelers having to stay in quarantine facilities in Tonga to be charged up to $4,000 for their stay.

The measure, which is expected to come into force in July, apply to Tongans stranded overseas and foreign nationals wanted to come to Tonga.

It is the latest twist in what has been described as conflicting answers coming from the government last week with the Minister of Finance denying there was such proposal.

The government is currently paying up to $4,000 to managed isolation and quarantine facilities (MIQ) per traveler. It pays about $600,000 to isolate passengers arriving per repatriated flight.

Communication (MEIDECC) CEO Paula Ma’u has confirmed to Kaniva News last week the proposal is currently underway for passengers to pay their stay in MIQ from their own pockets.

He previously said work to create the proposal was endorsed by the National Emergency Management Committee and National Committee for Covid-19.

He said when the proposal is completed it will be submitted to the two committees and if they approve it the proposal will then go to Cabinet for final decision.

Ma’u said the proposal was initiated after the costs for the managed isolation facilities were too expensive for the government to pay.

The planned quarantine fee was raised in parliament last week by former Minister of Health Saia Piukala.

The plan sparked heated debates online with critics calling on the government to withdraw the proposal.

Critics argued that the Tongan returnees were people who got stuck overseas because of Covid-19 and most of them were on visitor’s visas.

They said this was not a good proposal for people who returned from New Zealand and Australian seasonal worker programmes because the quarantine fees would be an equivalent of up to eight-week working in the farms.

South Auckland community leaders question police response to Harbour Bridge cycle protest

By One News / TVNZ and is republished with permission

Some South Auckland community leaders are questioning the official response to a weekend cycling protest on Auckland’s Harbour Bridge.

Only one arrest was made after more than 1000 cyclists forced their way onto the bridge. Source: 1 NEWS

Hundreds of bikers forced their way through a police cordon to ride over the bridge yesterday.

But, with just one arrest Auckland Councillor Efeso Collins is asking whether the group was shown leniency not shown to others.

“When you’re handling poorer people out south you’re treated one way by the police and when you’re managing people who are wealthy and in lycra you’ve got a completely different approach by the police,” he told 1 NEWS.

“You look at Ihumātao as an example, you had police in riot formation who’d turned up there, and then you get half a dozen cops trying to hold a gate together at the harbour bridge.”

Collins also equated it to what he believes was a heavy-handed police presence during the Rugby League World Cup in 2017 when Tongan supporters celebrated in the streets.

Manurewa’s Rowandale School principal Karl Vasu agrees.

“Imagine if this was a different group who pushed their way through a police cordon.

“There are people out there with other passionate issues and sometimes they’re not met with the same leniency or treated the same.”

1 NEWS asked police about allegations of bias.

In a statement they didn’t address the issue, but said they are continuing inquiries and a 47-year-old man arrested yesterday has now been cautioned.

Tonga, New Zealand and Australia ‘travel bubble’ plans revealed

A new plan to extend the Trans-Tasman travel bubble to include Tonga and Fiji in the Pacific islands has been part of a meeting between Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to discuss allowing quarantine-free travel to other countries.

The details of the plan have yet to be released.

The two-day talks began in Queenstown on Sunday, the first time the two leaders talk in person since Covid-19 closed borders in 2020.

Ardern said she looked forward to “the next stage of writing the rulebook” on how both countries would approach reopening to the world after Covid.

“We are supporting our Pacific family and the idea of a bubble that goes beyond New Zealand and Australia is a real possibility,” Morrison told reporters.

The revelation came after New Zealand’s pause on the quarantine-free travel bubble with Victoria has been extended for a further seven days, with the Australian state going into lockdown to contain a growing Covid-19 outbreak in Melbourne.

Tonga government said it planned to open its boarder to foreign nationals in March 2022.

It also revealed its plan for passengers to pay for their quarantine costs in Tonga which includes paying up to $4,000 if they will be isolated at Tanoa International Hotel.

Education icon and democratic activist Fīnau Tūtone dies aged 82

He and his family were regarded as role model when in comes to education particularly teachings, parenting and discipline.

Fīnau Tūtone

Finau Tūtone, 82, has died in Tonga and his body is expected to arrive in New Zealand this week, his son Dr Viliami Tūtone has confirmed to Kaniva News this morning.

All of his four children have university degrees and most of them are specialists in their various professions.

Two of them were named duxes at Tonga High School, the school where top students from primary schools are taught.

They are nephrologist Dr Viliami Tūtone, and physician Dr Siosaia Tūtone. Both are currently working as specialists in Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau in New Zealand.

Finau’s daughter Senitila was dux at Teachers’ Training College, now known as Tonga Institute of Education (TIHE). She is now the principal of TIHE.

His daughter ‘Ana Tūtone Tu’alau has a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in genetic.

As a teacher at primary and secondary schools and also an education officer in the Ministry of Education, Finau believed there were special blessings for teachers if they did the job well and to their best and if they have neglected it, it would put a curse on them.

He was instrumental in establishing Tonga teachers’ association known as The Friendly Islands Teachers’ Association (FITA). After he retired from teaching the association became a platform for his continued supports for teachers and giving advices on how to do the job well.

“Talk with your children and allow them to speak independently so that you can listen to what their opinions are,” was one of the common advices associated with Finau.

His teaching career began in 1958 after leaving Tupou College.

While there was general consensus in Tonga that physical discipline and smacking were some of the best ways of disciplining children Finau believed otherwise.

He said if a child at school or one of his own children misbehaved he just called them up and he stroke their hairs in a manner to persuade them to change their attitudes.

Political career

Finau was one of the six members of a group of Tongan students at the USP university in Fiji in 1976 who were known to be the first academics to formally meet and discuss a proposal to reform Tonga’s political structure.

Late Prime Minister and Opposition Leader ‘Akilisi Pohiva told Kaniva News in an interview the group members were him (‘Akilisi Pohiva), Finau Tutone, Lōpeti Senituli, ‘Uhila Liava’a, Sione Ma’ilei and Tēvita Kolokihakaufisi.

Pōhiva said they were interested in Tongan politics and wanted to pursue a proposal by former Minister of Education Late Dr Langikavaliku to the King’s Privy Council asking His Majesty to set up a commission to review the constitution so the government could be made more democratic.

They returned to Tonga in the 1980s and the group continued supporting Pōhiva in his attempts to pursue their political agenda.

In 2006 Late King George V agreed to relinquish his power to run the government to an elected-executive government. Tonga’s first democratic system of government came into fruition in 2010.

First Tongan woman to hold two honorary consul positions – Finland and Spain

‘Amelia Fakahiku’o’uiha Fonua Helu has been officially appointed as honorary consul of the kingdom of Spain to the kingdom of Tonga , Friday 28 at the Prime Minister’s Office, St George building in Nuku’alofa.

Prime Minister Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa (L), Honorary Consul ‘Amelia Fonua Helu. Photo/Supplied

Prime Minister of Tonga, Dr Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa officially presented the letter of exequatur on behalf of His Majesty’s government granting full execution of authority to the honorary consul to exercise official duties throughout Tonga.

Helu is also the honorary consul of Finland to the kingdom of Tonga.

Helu attended Samabula primary school in Suva, Fiji  then Tonga High School in Nuku’alofa for secondary school.

She was awarded with a bachelor degree from ‘Atenisi University and a Master of Arts degree in English literature from the University of Auckland.

She has other qualifications from various universities including ‘la Universidad Complutense de Madrid’ in Spain. She is fluent in English, Tongan and Spanish languages.

She worked for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the past years, including diplomatic posting to China and has vast experiences at regional and international level.

Closing arguments in fraud trial of Cabinet Minister Akosita Lavulavu and husband ousted former MP ‘Etuate

The Lavulavu couple knew they were misleading Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) schools funding by submitting fake names to support applications to claim money to which they were not entitled, a prosecutor told a Supreme Judge last week, in the defendants’ fraud trial.

‘Etuate Lavulavu and Minister of Infrastructure Akosita Lavulavu. Photo/Facebook

‘Etuate Lavulavu, who was representing himself, told Judge Nicholas Cooper he did not directly involve as he was away in Vava’u and in Fiji at the time of the incident and that prosecutors have failed to prove otherwise.

“What are the fake names that were added to the list? What went wrong with it and who were those fake names?” ‘Etuate asked at the end of the proceedings, local media reported.

Witnesses for Akosita told the court the names of students the prosecutor has submitted as fake were indeed students who were enrolled at Unuaki ‘O Tonga Royal Institute (UNRTI).

The prosecutors and the defendants were to finish their closing statements Friday 28, before Justice Cooper decides the Lavulavus’ fate.

The couple have pleaded not guilty to charges relating to knowingly dealt with forged documents and obtaining credit by false pretences.

An investigation was prompted by the Auditor General’s office claiming hundreds of students supposedly attending the UNTRI could not be identified and that the Institute should repay TP$553,800 to the Technical Vocational Education and Training fund (TVET).

Police charged the couple with using forged documents to support an application to obtain supplementary government funding to assist students at their UTRI private school.

Family, kāinga of RSE worker kiss his coffin in emotional moment at Tongatapu service

The grieving family members and friends of Fuifuikula ‘O Lofakaitamaki ‘Ealelei kissed his coffin in a heartbreaking service today in Tongatapu after it arrived from New Zealand.

The deceased’s body was placed in a closed coffin before it arrived in Tonga.

‘Ealelei, 36, died in his sleep in Hastings from heart attack. Also known as Munilaiti ‘Ealelei, he was in New Zealand as part of a group of Tongans who worked under the Recognised Seasonal Employment (RSE) programme in Hawkes Bay.

Those who spoke during his service this morning described their heartbreak at not being able to kiss him goodbye.

His body was placed in a closed coffin before it was flown to Tonga on Wednesday. The family were not allowed to open it.

This meant they would have only been allowed to view, touch and kiss his casket.

A spokesperson told Kaniva News this was part of the government’s strict rules in an attempt to continue to keep Tonga Covid-19 free.

The emotional farewell was led by a church minister and it was livestreamed on Facebook.

In the clip, shared to Facebook by Broadcom Broadcasting, ‘Ealelei’s mother and wife can be seen touching and kissing his coffin while lamenting his loss.

His young children can be seen carried to the coffin by some of the mourners before they were told to watch before kissing it.

As Kaniva News reported last week, the deceased’s family were able to watch ‘Ealelei’s body via video link shortly after his death.

The livestream video was organised by Tongan RSE workers in Hastings.

Gov’t conflicting answers over proposal for passengers to pay up to $4,000 quarantine fees cause confusion

The Minister of Finance denying a government proposal for returning passengers to pay up to $4,000 quarantine fees has sparked heated debates online.

(L-R) Minister of Health Dr ‘Amelia Tu’ipulotu, MEDECC CEO Paula Ma’u and Finance Minister Tēvita Lavemaau

His denial came after the Minister of Health and Communication (MEIDECC) CEO have confirmed the proposal.

Communication CEO Paula Ma’u has confirmed to Kaniva News this week the proposal is currently underway for passengers to pay their stay in managed isolation facilities from their own pockets.

In his email on Wednesday, in which the Prime Minister was copied, Ma’u told us the proposal included having passengers pay TOP$4,000 if they stayed at Tanoa International Hotel. He said other facilities would be cheaper.

Ma’u’s confirmation came after the Minister of Health Dr ‘Amelia Tu’ipulotu confirmed to local media in a press conference a week before it was true the government was working on a proposal for passengers to pay their isolation costs.

In a press release on May 12, Ma’u said work to create the proposal was endorsed by the National Emergency Management Committee and National Committee for Covid-19.

He said when the proposal is completed it will be submitted to the two committees and if they approve it the proposal will then go to Cabinet for final decision.

Ma’u said the proposal was initiated because the costs for the managed isolation facilities were too expensive for the government to pay.

He said it costs about $600,000 for the government to pay after passengers on one flight were isolated in Tonga for 21 days.

The Minister of Health shared the same information with local media.

Finance Minister denial

But the Minister of Finance Tevita Lavemaau has denied it in parliament on Thursday saying there was no proposal for the returning passengers to pay managed isolation facilities fees.

He said the government was still paying the passengers’ quarantine costs.

Lavemaau was responding to a question from Vava’u 14 MP Saia Piukala asking the Minister of Health to clarify the proposal which was planned to start in July.

The Minister of Finance has been contacted for comment on the conflicting information.

Social media reactions

Social media users have accused the government of contradicting itself.

Some have said the proposal was inappropriate because the returning passengers were stranded overseas for quite some times and they did not have enough money to pay for their quarantine.

Some said the government should continue to pay quarantine costs for workers who returned from New Zealand and Australian seasonal worker programmes because these people’s incomes and remittances helped Tonga’s economy.

Critics accused the government of failing to manage the public finances in a prudent manner.

However, supporters of the government insisted it was doing the right decision to help the country’s economy survive on long term.