Monday, February 23, 2026
Home Blog Page 48

Gov’t slashes board costs by $1M in cronyism purge; King signs ban on minister-picked directors

NUKU’ALOFA—The king has approved the Eke government’s bill to eliminate the practice of Cabinet Ministers selecting members of the government’s board of directors based on cronyism.

King Tupou VI

The move delivers on a campaign promise to overhaul all government bodies, targeting reform and alleged corruption.

The reforms significantly reduced the cost of board salaries by 29%, slashing annual spending from $1.4 million to just $400,000 and shrinking the total number of directors from 35 to 16.

The seven government boards had been consolidated into five, with appointments now guided by strict “fit and proper” standards.

The government said the move would end the old practice of selecting directors based on personal ties, church affiliations, or political favouritism.

King’s approval

Prime Minister Eke announced the King’s approval of the law on Friday, marking two milestone decisions. First, any government-owned business registered as a company must also be processed and registered as a public enterprise entity.

He said the law also mandates publicly advertised recruitment processes for all director appointments.

The Prime Minister, his Deputy Prime Minister, and several Cabinet Ministers were holding a press conference on Friday.

Deputy Prime Minister Taniela Fusimālohi claimed significant financial losses across government boards resulted from unscrupulous decision-making.

He said the government’s new mandatory “fit and proper person” criteria for selecting qualified, experienced directors will make sure only decent members are selected.

Fusimālohi questioned the appointments of the former board members when he saw a list of names.

He warned that the public would ultimately bear the financial consequences of poor board decisions.

He said this was why the government sought suitable and decent people to operate the government’s businesses.

“Look at Lulutai Airlines. What is happening there raises the question of a fit and proper person.

“Tonga Development Bank, there is the same question there, a fit and proper person”.

“This is not just about saving money—it’s about ensuring qualified, independent leaders oversee public resources,” Fusimālohi said in Tongan. 

“No more appointments just because someone is a friend or sits in the same pew on Sundays.”

Questions about the selection process follow a May 2022 Supreme Court case in which former Minister Poasi Tei admitted appointing Saia Penitani—a campaign helper in Houma village and ex-Ministry of Health staffer—to three boards (Tonga Power Ltd, Tonga Water Board, and Tonga Waste Authority) as Minister of Public Enterprises with Cabinet approval.

Tei denied in court that this was political payback, insisting he appointed Penitani based on trust in his ability to deliver results.

The new law

The new law mandates that government businesses be registered as companies and become public entities.

It follows allegations that the former Hu’akavameiliku government failed to register Lulutai Airlines as a Public Entity within the legally required one-year period – an omission that allowed Cabinet Ministers serving on the Lulutai board to retain their positions.

No legal challenges from outgoing board directors, gov’t had ‘productive meeting’ with them, DPM says as tensions rise over media criticism

 NUKU’ALOFA, Tonga—Deputy Prime Minister Taniela Fusimalohi has revealed that none of the board directors whose contract renewals were rejected by the Eke government pursued legal action, despite earlier claims of illegality.  

Katalina Tohi (L) and Deputy Prime Minister Taniela Fusimālohi

Fusimālohi also clarified that reports claiming the government had illegally terminated the contracts of former directors were misleading.  

He explained that the directors, appointed by the previous government, had remained in their board roles until March this year—the official end of their contracts.  

The Eke government rejected the pre-renewal of those contracts, which the Caretaker government approved around December 2024.  

Fusimālohi defended the government’s decision, stating that the Caretaker government lacked the authority to renew contracts as it held limited powers pending the incoming government’s transition.  

Agreement with former directors  

Fusimālohi revealed that the Minister for Public Enterprises had a “productive discussion” with the former directors.  

Fusimālohi said the Minister met with them and explained the government’s new policy and guidelines for all government boards.  

According to Fusimālohi, the Minister informed the former directors of their contract end dates, explained the new restructuring process, noted that a new recruitment would occur, and stated they could reapply.

Fusimālohi said in Tongan: “Pea’ ne ‘osi fai e talanoa lelei ia ‘a e Minisitaá mo kinautolu. Ko e kaha‘u ē te tau fokotu‘utu‘u lelei. Ko ho‘omou me‘á ē ‘oku ha‘u ‘o ngata hē. ‘E toe fai e likulutimeni fo‘ou. Mou kei ‘enitaitolo pe ki ai.”  

The revelation and clarifications come amid escalating tensions between the government and local media, particularly after Fusimalohi called for the removal (“to‘o”) of FM 87.5’s radio show in which host Siaosi Lavaka featured Tongan-based Auckland lawyer Nalesoni Tupou, who allegedly claimed that the contract terminations were unlawful.   

Directors’ Exit Sparks Legal Debate

However, critics, including broadcaster Katalina Tohi, who owns FM 87.5, have accused the Eke administration of disregarding natural justice.  

Tohi warned that the former directors had legal rights and referenced past cases where similar government actions led to costly court rulings.  

Responding to Tohi, Fusimālohi emphasised that journalists (kau faiongoongo) must verify their facts before presenting commentary or analysis. 

He explained that this is why the government holds one-hour press conferences every Friday—to ensure the media receives accurate information. 

He said he had already advised journalists to read Parliamentary Hansard and government statements before reporting.  

COMMENTARY As King welcomes Eke government public curiosity turns to constitutional demands 

Commentary – The Eke government’s recent update, confirming the Prime Minister’s regular meetings with the King, signals a positive relationship between the monarchy and the current administration.

PM Dr. ‘Aisake Valu ‘Eke holds regular meetings with the king, marking improved executive-royal relations under Clause 50(a)3 of Tonga’s Constitution.

This development carries particular significance, given the stark contrast with former Prime Minister Huʻakavameiliku’s tenure, when tensions with the palace escalated to the point where the King promptly approved his resignation letter. 

The late Prime Minister Pōhiva Tu’i’onetoa once sought membership in the King’s Privy Council, proposing this would allow him to advise the monarch in real time on governmental matters. The King denied the request, maintaining that both leaders must adhere to their constitutionally mandated roles.

It appears Tu’i’onetoa failed to recognise the superior opportunity available under Clause 50(a)3, which empowers the Prime Minister to report to the King on state affairs formally.

The warm King-PM meetings also mark a striking departure from years of royal friction with previous governments. Where past prime ministers faced cold shoulders—despite constitutional obligations for regular briefings—the King’s openness to Eke suggests cautious approval of the current administration.

Constitutional Duties Defined

This shift raises questions: Is this mere symbolism, or does it reflect genuine progress in governance?  

The answer lies in what sets Eke apart from his predecessor. Unlike Huʻakavameiliku, under whose administration corrupt systems persisted, Eke’s demonstrated commitment to dismantling Tonga’s entrenched patronage structures appears to have earned him the King’s confidence.

Eke’s administration has demonstrated exceptional transparency through its unprecedented weekly hour-long press conferences—a practice maintained every Friday since taking office.

The government has also established a high benchmark for accountability by delivering on key campaign promises, including comprehensive reforms of Lulutai Airlines, a thorough review and restructuring of all government boards, and the resolution of the protracted Tonga Development Bank/National Reserve Bank dispute, among other significant policy achievements.

This leads us to the next critical question: What does Tonga’s Constitution actually say about King-PM meetings? To understand this, we must examine the constitutional text itself.  

Clause 50(a)3 of Tonga’s constitution says:

“The Prime Minister shall regularly and as required report to the King upon matters that have arisen with the government and upon the state of the country.”

From an analysis point of view, the phrase “matters that have arisen with the government and upon the state of the country” could refer to pressing issues impacting both national leadership and the nation as a whole.

These typically involve government-related controversies, such as corruption scandals, financial mismanagement, or lack of transparency, that undermine public trust.

At the same time, they reflect broader national challenges, including economic instability, social inequality, or systemic failures in public services. 

Fakalotofale Drives Reforms

In other words, these meetings are fakalotofale (a Tongan term for confidential in-house discussions) between the King and Prime Minister, where open dialogue on any matter is permitted.

Late Prime Minister Akilisi Pōhiva told Kaniva News the King reviewed Cabinet travel records during a meeting and objected to two ministers’ excessive trips. The PM then warned ministers about the King’s concerns.

In the context of Lulutai Airlines’ failures, including the $60 million in missing records and the Tonga Development Bank/National Reserve Bank saga, these matters absolutely warrant reporting to the King under constitutional Clause 50(a)3. Since the government’s announcement of its board restructuring plans and director appointments, these are key reforms the King deserves to know, and they must be reported to the King.  

This meeting enables the Prime Minister to inform the King about parliamentary obstructions, particularly opposition from the nobility regarding critical bills, that undermine governance efficiency. This communication is crucial, as the King holds unique influence over the nobility that could help resolve such impasses.

These meetings are not limited to presenting a strategic opportunity for the Prime Minister. Demonstrating government competence, he can build royal trust while tactfully advocating for Tonga’s most urgent need: systemic political reforms.

Transparency here builds confidence in the government’s overhaul of Tonga’s compromised systems. 

Tonga Police enforce Sunday trading ban in wake of King’s call for Sabbath observance

The Tonga Police have reinforced their warning against Sunday trading, following King Tupou VI’s recent reaffirmation of the nation’s Christian values and strict Sabbath observance.

The monarch’s remarks come amid reports by Kaniva News highlighting uneven enforcement of Sunday trading laws, with some businesses allegedly remaining open for tourists while locals face restrictions.

Under Tongan law, operating or shopping at businesses on Sundays is prohibited, with penalties for vendors and customers.

The police statement this evening follows numerous complaints about shops operating across Tongatapu on Sundays, which violates national law.

Under Tongan law, opening or operating a shop on Sundays, as well as selling or purchasing goods on this day, is illegal.

Authorities have made it clear that both shop owners and customers found breaking these rules will face consequences.

The police emphasised the importance of upholding Tonga’s cultural and religious traditions, urging the community to respect Sunday as a sacred day.

In their announcement, the Tonga Police called on the public to honour the country’s faith-based values by refraining from commercial activities on Sundays.

The statement concludes with a respectful tone, reaffirming the police’s commitment to maintaining the law while preserving the nation’s way of life.

It comes after the king reminded citizens of broader biblical commandments such as “Thou shalt not steal” and “Thou shalt not covet,” urging Tongans to reject jealousy and materialism.

Massive Drug Bust at Auckland Airport: $26M Worth of Meth and Cocaine Seized

New Zealand Customs officers made a major breakthrough in the fight against drug trafficking, intercepting 67.8kg of methamphetamine and 1.1kg of cocaine at Auckland International Airport in two separate operations on 29 May 2025.

The combined street value of the seized drugs is estimated at up to NZ$25.81 million, marking one of the most significant drug busts at the border this year.

In the first interception, customs officials discovered 50kg of methamphetamine hidden in unaccompanied baggage arriving on a flight from Malaysia.

Hours later, officers identified 17.8kg of methamphetamine and 1.1kg of cocaine concealed in the luggage of a 22-year-old male passenger arriving from New York. The suspect was immediately arrested and now faces serious drug importation charges.

Customs Acting Manager Donnelle Nicholson commended the officers involved, stating, “Both these seizures were the result of the excellent skills of our frontline officers who recognised tell-tale signs that prompted further investigations. Customs officers are relentless in their drive and commitment to protect our border and people from harm. They take a great deal of pride when they achieve successes like these overnight”

Nicholson emphasised that customs officers remain unwavering in protecting New Zealand’s borders from illegal substances.

The latest seizures add to an already impressive record for 2025, with customs officials stopping approximately half a tonne of illicit drugs from entering New Zealand through Auckland International Airport alone this year.

Authorities attribute this success to enhanced screening technologies, improved intelligence sharing, and the sharp observational skills of border protection staff.

New Zealand Customs encourages the public to report any suspicious activity related to drug smuggling through their 24-hour confidential hotline at 0800 WE PROTECT (0800 937 768) or anonymously via Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

The recent intercepts serve as a stern warning to criminal organisations attempting to traffic drugs through New Zealand’s borders.

As investigations continue, authorities have not ruled out further arrests concerning these cases.

The massive haul underscores the ongoing challenges faced by border security agencies in combating the international drug trade while demonstrating New Zealand’s strong stance against narcotics trafficking.

Tonga in health crisis as last ENT specialist departs – PM Eke scrambles for solution

Tonga is facing a critical shortage in specialised healthcare services following the departure of Dr Āmone Vaka’uta, the country’s last remaining Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) specialist.

He is said to have taken up a new position in the Marshall Islands.

The Prime Minister was informed this afternoon that the lack of an ENT specialist has raised significant concerns among the public regarding access to essential medical care for related conditions.

Prime Minister Eke said there is currently a doctor working in the ENT department, but he did not say whether he was a specialist.

“We are aware of this critical gap and are taking steps to resolve it,” PM Eke stated in Tonga.

However, he stopped short of specific details about the government’s plans or timeline for securing a replacement specialist.

Tonga’s Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) department was established in 1987 by the Late Dr Leiukamea Saafi, a consultant specialist and head of the department.

After the report of the vacancy this week, social media platforms have seen growing calls for the government to prioritise medical workforce development to prevent similar shortages in other specialities.

In 2020, it was reported that the Eisdell Moore Centre from New Zealand worked with colleagues in the Pacific region, including Tonga, to support the development of Ear and Hearing Care services in the region.   

It was reported at the time that a volunteer Audiology Specialist from New Zealand, Mr Philip Luey, started working at the clinic in Tonga two days a week to assist with the development of the new audiology service. 

A local visiting team regularly travelled around the outer island to conduct outpatient clinics and surgeries for the local community.

Deputy PM warns journalists: ‘Get Your Facts Right’ – suggests radio show be shut down over alleged misinformation

Nuku’alofa, Tonga—Deputy Prime Minister Dr Taniela Fusimālohi has issued a sharp warning to journalists, urging them to verify facts before reporting.

Deputy Prime Minister Dr Taniela Fusimālohi

This follows criticism of an FM87.5 radio program hosted by Siaosi Lavaka and featuring New Zealand-based Tongan lawyer Nalesoni Tupou.

According to Fusimālohi, the controversy arose after Tupou allegedly claimed that the government acted illegally when it terminated contracts of the former Board of Directors of the government.

Fusimālohi strongly refuted the claim during a press conference in Nuku’alofa this afternoon, stating that the termination was “nothing wrong.”

He claimed that the caretaker government had wrongly renewed the contracts, as it was legally prohibited from making decisions that could result in such “financial commitments.”

The Deputy PM went further, suggesting that the radio program should be shut down, after accusing it of spreading misinformation that could mislead the public.

Katalina Tohi, owner of FM87.5, challenged Fusimālohi regarding the contract terminations. She warned that similar situations had occurred previously when the government made decisions that resulted in court cases in which the government was ultimately fined.

However, the Prime Minister stepped in, clarifying that a caretaker government, according to the law, was not in a position to make decisions that should have been left for the upcoming government.

It is understood that the Board of Directors’ contracts were supposed to end in March 2025, but the caretaker government renewed them around December 2024.

The government has not indicated whether it will take formal action against the station, but Fusimālohi’s remarks signal a hardening stance against what officials perceive as irresponsible journalism.

This latest clash highlights ongoing tensions between the Tongan government and media over reporting standards and legal interpretations.

The Minister of Public Enterprises Piveni Piukala has accused local journalists of reckless reporting regarding allegations about the review of government boards.

He said that none of them had actually approached him with questions to verify the facts surrounding the issue.

Tonga Gov’t threatens to cut grants to church schools again over failure to account for funds – PM calls it a ‘Big Issue’

Nuku’alofa, Tonga—The Tongan government has sternly warned church-run schools that it will stop paying school grants unless they provide proper accountability for how the funds were spent.

The warning highlights recurring issues, including halted foreign grants, ongoing court cases against school operators, and previous suspensions of funding due to similar failures.

Prime Minister Eke expressed frustration over the lack of financial reporting, calling it a “big issue” for the government.

The Prime Minister revealed that school directors had blamed their inability to submit reports on principals’ failure to cooperate, with some citing teachers’ being on holiday as a reason for the delay.

This comes after the Ministry of Education and Training previously withheld funding for non-government high schools for over three years starting in 2021, following findings that some grants were not used in line with the funding program’s objectives.

The issue has resurfaced amid an ongoing court case involving alleged misuse of government education funds. The case involves former MPs and Cabinet Ministers Akosita Lavulavu and her husband, Etuate Lavulavu, who were charged after a 2016 audit of the ‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga Royal Institute uncovered financial irregularities.

The government previously emphasised that transparency is non-negotiable, and schools must comply with financial reporting requirements to continue receiving state support. Failure to do so, officials warn, could result in permanent funding cuts.

Education advocates have raised concerns over the potential impact on students, urging both the government and school administrations to resolve the matter swiftly to avoid disruptions in learning.

As Kaniva News reported previously, New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade contributed NZ$4,458,606 through the TESPII scheme, via a grant to the Government of Tonga, from 2013 to 2016.

“A proportion of this funding went to school grants, which included assistance to non-government schools,” a spokesperson told Te Waha Nui.

These funds were managed by Tonga’s Ministry of Education and Training under terms set out in the Grant Funding Arrangement.

New Zealand’s current education support to Tonga is focused on numeracy and literacy outcomes for students, as well as education policy.

New Zealand has a record of putting a stop to its aid funding to Tonga when controversies arise.

In 2013 New Zealand’s foreign minister said he would withhold tourism funding to Tonga until a plane gifted by China was certified by a respected international authority, despite China insisting it was safe.

Fiji, Vanuatu move to end Tonga student border rejections following Minister’s formal complain

Nuku’alofa, Tonga – Tonga’s Education Minister, Pingi Fasi, has formally complained to Fijian and Vanuatu authorities after numerous Tongan students were denied entry and sent back home due to visa issues, despite a long-standing visa-free agreement between the nations.

The matter was recently addressed during a high-level meeting with University of the South Pacific (USP) officials in New Zealand, where Minister Fasi revealed that students were being turned away at airports without proper justification.

“When we raised the issue, they were surprised and claimed they didn’t know about it happened,” Fasi said.

Following urgent discussions, Fiji and Vanuatu agreed to immediately stop the practice and ensure border officials are properly informed of the agreement.

The minister hailed the resolution as a significant step forward, emphasising that the treaty should facilitate seamless travel for Tongan students and citizens.

COMMENTARY Setting the record straight on the King’s role in hereditary title disputes

CommentaryKaniva News’ report on the King’s authority over hereditary titles has triggered heated debate online.

At the heart of the debate is the interpretation of two key constitutional clauses—Section 50(2) and Section 44—and how they interact in matters of noble succession.

The controversy stems from our report last night on the court case of Lord Fielakepa and his nephew Tupou Tongaliuaki Filo‘aulo Aleamotu‘a, in which the Land Court initially ruled in favour of Tupou Tongaliuaki Filo‘aulo Aleamotu‘a as the rightful heir.

Fielakepa then appealed to the Privy Council under Section 50(2), seeking to revoke the Lands Court decision. However, the King exercised his constitutional authority under that clause to uphold that Fielakepa’s nephew Tupou Tongaliuaki Filo‘aulo Aleamotu‘a was the rightful air, issuing a final and binding decision.

The constitution clause 50 (2) says: Constitution and powers of Privy Council

If any case shall be heard in the Land Court relating to the determination of hereditary estates and titles, it shall be lawful for either party thereto to appeal to the King in Privy Council which shall determine how the appeal shall proceed and the judgment of the King in Privy Council shall be final.

The constitution clause 44 says: King may confer titles

It is the King’s prerogative to give titles of honour and to confer honourable distinctions but it shall not be lawful for him to deprive anyone who has an hereditary title of his title such as chiefs of hereditary lands and nobles of the Legislative Assembly who possess hereditary lands except in cases of treason. And if anyone shall be tried and found guilty of treason the King shall appoint a member of that family to succeed to the name and inheritance of the guilty person.

Critics argue that such royal discretion could undermine hereditary traditions, while supporters maintain that the King’s role as the ultimate arbiter ensures legal finality.

Importantly, Section 44 explicitly prohibits the King from arbitrarily stripping hereditary titles—except in cases of treason—while Section 50(2) comes into play only when disputes are formally appealed to the Privy Council.

This legal framework ensures checks and balances, meaning the King cannot act unilaterally to remove titles, but once a case reaches the Privy Council, his judgment is conclusive.

The Fielakepa case exemplifies this process, affirming that the monarchy’s powers are constitutionally defined and judicially circumscribed.