COMMENTARY: Following the extensive and suspicious delays in the appointment of Hon. Eke’s Cabinet by the king, the most important question is this: what constitutional requirements are so important that they have to be addressed before Cabinet can be appointed?
Why has the kingdom been kept waiting for more than a month for Cabinet to be appointed?
Hon. Eke told Kaniva News His Majesty was expected to appoint his Cabinet towards this weekend (“faka’osinga uike”). He did not say exactly on what day.
When Eke was asked for the reasons why the royal appointment was delayed, he said that it was due to the need to fulfil certain constitutional requirements (“ngaahi fiema’u fakakonisitūtone”).
The Constitution clearly outlines the straightforward process for nominating and recommending Cabinet Ministers to the king for their appointments.
Given this clarity, it makes one wonder what other provisions in the Constitution or interpretations may not be fully comprehended or adequately addressed, thereby contributing to these prolonged delays.
Eke was responding after we sent him several questions based on unconfirmed information circulated on the wire regarding the appointment.
We also asked him two other questions to which he did not reply.
We asked him whether it was true the king had not accepted some of the nominees he had recommended.
We also asked whether it was true that he was told to wait because the king’s Privy Council was working on its own nominations for the Cabinet Ministers.
The prolonged postponement represents the first instance, since the democratic reforms of 2010, in which this process has extended beyond a month following the premiership election conducted on December 24, 2024.
The procedure
It has been normal practice that it takes no more than two weeks after the Prime Ministerial election for the king to appoint the Prime Minister, followed by the appointment of the Cabinet Ministers the same day.
Former Prime Minister Hu’akavameiliku was elected on December 15, 2022. Only 12 days later, on December 27, the king appointed him to the premiership. It was reported that during Hu’akavameiliku’s appointment, he presented to the king his Cabinet lineup, which the king appointed the same day.
The Late Prime Minister Pohiva Tu’i’onetoa was elected as Prime Minister by Parliament on September 27, 2019. He was appointed by the king on October 8, 2019. That is an 11-day timeframe. Tu’i’onetoa confirmed to Kaniva News his Cabinet lineup on the same day the king confirmed their appointed.
However, despite the quick processes in the appointment of these two Prime Ministers and their Cabinets their relationship with the king soured before His Majesty chastised Tu’i’onetoa’s government in his Parliamentary speech in May, 2021.
In February, 2024 the king withdrew support for Hu’akavameiliku as Defence Minister, a move the Attorney General said was “unconstitutional.”
Prime Minister’s ‘executive authority’
The circumstances surrounding Eke’s situation appear to reflect a back-and-forth interaction predominantly influenced by the king, resulting in delays in the appointment of his Cabinet, which appears to contravene the Constitution.
The Constitution grants the Prime Minister, as the head of the Cabinet, the authoritative power to run the government unchallenged within that context. It also gives the power to nominate the Cabinet Ministers to the Prime Minister.
It labels this power of the Prime Minister as “executive authority” given to his Cabinet.
Clause 51 of Section One of the Constitution says:
“The executive authority of the Kingdom shall vest in the Cabinet, which shall be collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly for the executive functions of the Government”.
The constitution also delineates the power of the Prime Minister over his Cabinet as fundamentally absolute and any intervention by the monarch or his Privy Council is unwarranted.
Section 2 says: “The Cabinet shall consist of the Prime Minister and such other Ministers who are nominated by the Prime Minister and appointed by the King”.
Clause 51, Section 7 says:
“(7) The term “executive authority” in sub-clause (1) excludes all powers vested in the King or the King in Council, whether by this Constitution, or any Act of the Legislative Assembly, any subordinate legislation, and Royal Prerogatives.”
Call for clarifications
Whatever the reasons behind this unexpected delay, the Prime Minister needs to come clean as soon as possible and explain this to the public.
It’s essential that any actions related to the Constitution maintain a high level of transparency, especially in light of recent claims that it has been violated. The latest was when the Attorney General said last year that the letter from the king’s Privy Council expressing His Majesty’s loss of confidence in former Prime Minister Hu’akavameiliku being the Minister of Defence was “unconstitutional.”
There is no doubt the Tongan practice of mālū‘ia (emotions emanating from the presence of the king) may be strong in Eke. He must stand by the transparency and accountability policies he announced after his election in December.
He has received commendation for the proactive measures he announced to address corruption and the misappropriation of public funds, issues that have adversely affected the nation for an extended period.
He is expected to take the same measure when it comes to his relationship with the king.
It is essential that he provides full transparency to the public regarding all relevant information pertaining to his Cabinet.
This includes any issues that may potentially affect the public’s expectations concerning the nomination process, which should adhere strictly to his discretion.