Notorious car trader Filimone Toāaho has been given a two-year suspended jail sentence after he failed to deliver 20 vehicles promised to be imported under the ownership of the owner of a finance company.
Filimone To’aho. Photo/Facebook
Toāaho, 40, had borrowed TOP$17,767.81 to purchase the motor vehicles from Japan.
As security, he pledged ownership of the vehicles in favour of the complainant.
Toāaho agreed to sell the vehicles, save for two which were to be retained by the complainant, repay the loan from the proceeds of the sales and retain the balance. The complainant agreed.
Accordingly, on 3 November 2017, the complainant arranged for a telegraphic transfer of the funds to SBT Japan.
By March 2018, the complainant had not received the vehicles. Taoāaho told the complainant that the ship had been delayed. However, later that same month, an associate of the convict informed the complainant that the vehicles in question had arrived from Japan but that Toāaho had sold them to other car dealerships.
A representative of the shipping company confirmed that the Defendant had changed the ownership of the 20 vehicles from the complainant to two other car dealerships. When confronted, Toāaho purported to explain that he had changed the ownership of the vehicles to the other dealerships because the complainant had not advanced all the money he 2 requested . The complainant refuted that explanation and told the Defendant that if she could not receive her vehicles, she wanted her money back.
He was convicted by Chief Justice Whitten of theft and is sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment.
The sentence is to be fully suspended for a period of 2 years from this day, on the following conditions, namely, that during the period of suspension, To’aho is to:
(a) not commit any offence punishable by imprisonment;
(b) be placed on probation;
(c) report to the probation office within the next 48 hours;
(d) perform 60 hours of community service as directed by his probation officer;
and
(e) pay the complainant (by payment into court) the remaining balance of $2,924.56 by 30 July 2021 .
“Failure to comply with any of the above conditions may result in the suspension being rescinded, in which case, the Defendant will be required to serve the balance of his sentence”.
Presentence report
His presentence report said Toāaho is the second eldest of five children . He was raised in a good family. Both his parents were primary school teachers. He was well educated and received a diploma in teaching.
Toāaho is no stranger to car trading controversy and court.
He previously appeared in court after he reportedly failed to deliver eight vehicles purchased by a customer.
in that case, Toāaho of Tokomololo and co-accused Lesieli Langi were jointly charged with criminal conspiracy with intent to defraud $17,767.81 after the customer did not received the vehicles in November 2017.
As Kaniva news reported in 2016, the Holonga Vavaʻu Development Committee did not receive their TP$23,000 refund from Toʻaho and his Super Cheap car dealership despite a court order.
The money was paid after Super Cheap promised it would provide a passenger bus bought by the Committee.
FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA
Kuo tauteaāi āe he āEiki Fakamaau Lahiā āa Filimone Toāaho taāu 40 āa ia Ā kuo āiloa ki hono kÄkaaāi āo e kakaiā āi he malaāe āo Ā e fakatau meāaleleā ke ne ngÄue pÅpula mÄhina 12 kae toloi kakato āi he taāu āe ua. Ko e tautea āeni hili āene alea mo ha kautaha nÅ ke āoange āa e paāanga āe TOP$17,767.81 ka ne hu mai āa e meāalele āe 20 mei Siapani āi he hingoa āo e tokotaha āaāana āa e kautaha nooā. Ne kei tali e tokotaha ko āeni ki he alea ta ko Ä kuo āosi tuāuta āi Tonga āa e āÅ« meāalele kae liliu āe Toāaho ia āa e āounasipiā āo fakatau āe ia ki he tila kehe āa e āÅ« meāaleleā ni. āOku āikai ko haāane toki hÄ āeni āi he fakamaauāangaā fekauāaki mo āene taāefaitotonu āi he alea fakatau meāaleleā.
Why has nothing been done to remove āAKosita Lavulavu from office and why does her husband appear to wield so much influence over the Prime Minister, even though he was thrown out of Parliament for breaching the electoral law?
In the wake of their sentencing last Friday, the relationship between the Lavulavus and Prime Minister PÅhiva TuŹ»iŹ»onetoa has come under even closer scrutiny.
Now veteran Tongan journalist Kalafi Moala has raised concerns about theĀ need for a proper investigation.
Condemned by the Supreme Court as dishonest and deceitful, āAkosita and āEtuate Lavulavu have been sentenced to five and six years respectively for their part in a sustained fraud.
Judge Cooper, presiding, described their crime as āthe worst sort of dishonesty.ā
“The conduct of these defendants would be disgraceful in anyone, but for a member of cabinet, and a man who used his political connections and position to facilitate these frauds, goes beyond just criminally reprehensible,” he said.
Kalafi Moala. Photo/Kaniva Tonga News
Unlike former Democrat Prime Minister āAkilisi Pohiva, who fired āAkosita from Cabinet as soon as she was charged, TuŹ»iŹ»onetoa has done nothing, claiming he does not have the constitutional power to get rid of her.
As Kaniva News has pointed out time and again, that is simply not true.
The disgraced Cabinet Minister has remained on full pay the whole time.
Meanwhile, her husband āEtuate, who she replaced as Member for Vavaāu 16 after he was kicked out of Parliament for bribery,Ā continues to have a close relationship with the Prime Minister.
Moala said last year Tuāiāonetoa relied heavily on āEtuate for ideas of how to run the government.
He described āEtuate as the most influential official from the ruling party and the main influence on the Prime Minister.
Now he has raised the question of the need for a proper investigation into Tuāiāonetoaās relationship with the Lavulavus.
(L-R) Prime Minister PÅhiva Tu’i’onetoa and Tourism Minister Akosita Lavulavu
āQuestions are raised concerning the huge multi-million pa’anga road projects the Prime Minister and ‘Etuate Lavulavu are involved in,ā Moala wrote.
āThe Ministry of Infrastructure under āAkosita handles all the multimillion infrastructural projects including roadworks and major constructions.ā
Moala also said the Prime Minister had ignored the ruling of Justice Cooper and defended the couple in several speeches.
Disgraced
The disgraced former MP was criticised for appearing to act as a spokesman for the Prime Minister, even though he holds no official government office.
Early last year there were complaints in Vavaāu after he interfered during parliamentary meetings in LeimÄtuāa and Hahake districts.
At the end of last year he accompanied the Prime Minister and Cabinet Members on their grand procession for prayer and fastingĀ around the kingdom, speaking for the government apparently even making fun of the Prime Minister.
Lavulavu is known by the title āengineerā in some circles for his role in creating the Peopleās Party and persuading some DemocratĀ MPs to abandon the late āAkilisi Pohivaās party and join Tuāiāonetoa.
‘Etuate is regarded as having been instrumental in devising the governmentās controversial multi-million roading policy. Contracts for the project went to companies with strong links to the government.
Apart from an earlier conviction in the United States, ‘Etuate is also facing a lawsuit after he was accused of forging a landlordās signature in Vavaāu from whom he leased land.
In 2000 he was sued by Late Prince Tuāipelehake for damages and unlawful cultivation of his land. Chief Justice Ward ordered Lavulavu to quit the land and pay $7,905 damages. Chief Justice Ward was scathing about aspects of Lavulavuās testimony during the trial,Ā saying: āI felt he was willing to say almost anything that seemed to suit the moment with a repeated disregard for the truth.ā
FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA
Ko e fehuāi mahuāinga ia āoku āekeāi he taimi niā pe ko e hÄ ko Ä kuo fuāu pipiki pehÄ fau ai āa e palÄmia āi he ongo Lavulavu kuo mahino āena kaihaāasi āa e paāanga āa e fonuaā pea ko e hia mamafa ia? āOku loloto ange hohaāa ko āeni he mahino ne āikai tuku ha ivi āo e palÄmiaā heāene taukapoāi e totonu āa Akosita āaki e kupu 23. A’u ‘o tangi mai he letioo’ pea mo ne tukuaki’i e ngaahi ako siasi hange ne nau fai e hia tatau mo e ongo Lavulavu ki he pa’anga tokoni ‘a e pule’anga’ ki he ngaahi ako’anga’. Pea ne mei hua pe ia kapau ne āikai ha toe kupu te ne ‘oange hano mafai ke ne tuku ai ki tuāa āa Akosita. A ia ko e Ā kupu 51(3)(a) pea ka fai ange āo iku āa Akosita ke ne āekeāi fakalao hono tuku ia ki tuāa āuhi ko e kupu 23 pea tuku ke ne āeke kae maluāi āe he palÄmia ia mo e puleāanga āaki āa e kupu 51(3)(a) he ko ia pe naāa ne fili ke minisitaaā, lolotonga ne ne ‘ilo pe kuo faka’ilo ‘a Akosita, pea āoku faāiteliha pe ia ke ne tuku ki tuāa. Kuo fakamatalaāi mai āe he fakamaau lahi āa e lanu totonu āo Akosita ko e fefine taāefaitotonu. Kae Ā kei fakalaloaāi pe ia āe he palÄmiaā. Ko e lekooti āeni āi ha toe puleāangaā ko e hÅ« pe āa ha minisitÄ mei he kapinetiā āo hangatonu āo ngÄue pÅpula. Kuo fakatokanga mai āa Kalafi Moala kuo āi ai āa e Ā ui ke fakatotoloāi āa e palÄmiaā mo e ongo Lavulavuā pea tautefito ki he mahina āe taha fakamuimui ne kei tuku pe āa Akosita āi he potungÄue ki he ngÄue lalahi lolotonga kuo mahino kuo na halaia pea te ne ngÄue pÅpulaā. āOku taau ke fai āa e fakatotolo ko āeni he kuo āikai kei falalaāia āa e palÄmiaā Ā he lahi āene ngaahi fakamatala taāemoāoni kuo fafangaāaki āa e fonuaā fekauāaki mo e ngaahi tukuakiāi āo ia mo hono puleāangaā.
Winger Will Jordan scored five tries as the All Blacks opened their 2021 campaign with a record-equalling 102-0 trouncing of an inexperienced Tonga side on Saturday at Auckland’s Mount Smart Stadium.
Looking to make a statement after managing only a 50 per cent win record last year, New Zealand ran in 16 tries against a team boasting fewer combined test caps than All Blacks skipper Sam Whitelock alone.
Tonga, featuring 13 debutants in their matchday 23 after Covid-19 travel restrictions deprived them of their Europe-based players, were simply outgunned and outsmarted in a mismatch of a contest.
Beauden Barrett, back in the famous black shirt after a sabbatical in Japan, converted the final try after coming on as a replacement to equal the score in the mauling the Tongans suffered at Albany in 2000.
Jordan came up one short of the All Blacks record for most tries in one match, set by Marc Ellis in the 145-17 win over Japan at the 1995 World Cup in South Africa.
“It was good to get out there,” said Whitelock, who was playing his 123rd test.
“The Tongan team were here to play and it wasn’t easy out there.”
The All Blacks coach Ian Foster bristled at suggestions the one-sided test wasn’t good for either side and should never have been played.
Fans and pundits were largely in agreement the game was a poor look for international rugby, but Foster said he hoped the storyline would not be around how much of a gap there was between the two teams.
He said the Covid pandemic had made things more difficult for Tonga and was asked how the match could have been made a more even contest.
“Take away Covid, take away quarantining and add another month on the calendar for the world rugby thing. There is no solution to that right now,” Foster said.
“I’d be disappointed if that’s what we are dwelling on. We weren’t happy last year when we got no rugby. This year we’ve got some rugby. Clearly the itinerary has put Tonga in a compromised position, but they’ve been keen to play and deserve a lot of credit for that.
“I’d like think we aren’t just going to focus on the scoreline and say this was a game that shouldn’t have happened, because for the Tongan people it was an important game, and it was equally important for us to go out and start what could be a long year.
“In today’s environment you take what you can get.”
Fullback Damian McKenzie crossed for the first try in the second minute and, after Dalton Papalii had touched down and Will Jordan and Brad Weber had grabbed a brace each, the All Blacks were 38-0 up in the 20th minute.
Tonga managed to stem the torrent of tries temporarily by abandoning the tactic of kicking away possession but flanker Papalii grabbed his second try in the 37th minute to give the home side a 43-0 lead at the break.
No.8 Luke Jacobson crossed soon after the restart with winger Jordan and halfback Weber completing their hat-tricks before the 50th minute.
The Tongans, many fresh out of quarantine, started to tire and the All Blacks backs put on an exhibition with Richie Mo’unga crossing, Jordan adding his fourth and fifth tries and centre Rieko Ioane racing away to touch down.
Lock Patrick Tuipulotu burst through the defensive line to take the score into the 90s with three minutes remaining and winger George Bridge crossed on the overlap after the fulltime siren to take them to the century mark.
“We didn’t get the result tonight but I’m very proud of my brothers here,” said emotional Tonga captain Sonatane Takulua.
According to Tongan law, the Lavulavus could be granted bail if the court is satisfied that ā there is a reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding; the appeal is unlikely to be heard before the whole or a substantial portion of the sentence has been served; and there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (whether or not subject to conditions) he will surrender to custody without committing any offence whilst on bail.
The appeal by the Lavulavus came after the Appeal Court in 2019 refused Tongasat companyās application to present new evidence in an appeal against a decision handed down against it.
Tongasat ā formally known as the FriendlyĀ Islands Satellite Telecommunications Ltd ā appealed the judgment and asked the court for permission to produce new evidence.
New evidence can only be introduced if the court grants permission on special grounds.
However, the Court said none of the evidence was discovered for the first time after the trial.
āThe role and involvement of the new witnesses was known in 2008 and 2011, the witnesses were living in Tonga and available to be interviewed here,ā the Court report said.
The Tongasat appeal was therefore dismissed.
Lavulavu sentencingĀ
Former Cabinet Minister and MP āAkosita has been sentenced to six years inĀ prison.
However, the Supreme Court suspended the last 12 months of her sentence Ā for two years on condition that she comply with the probation officer, satisfactorily complete a life skills course and commit no offence punishable by imprisonment.
Her husband, who has a long record ofĀ court appearances and convictions, will serve the full six years.
Both defendants were convicted on three counts of obtaining money by false pretences.
They were found guilty of fraudulently obtaining money from the Ministry of Education and Training by lying in applications for money from the Technical Vocational Educational Training Grant about the number of students enrolled at their private college, the āUnuaki āo Tonga Royal Institute.
Mr Justice Cooper, presiding, said, he utterly rejected their claims that the money was used for the Institute.
The judge said they could have been charged with theft.
The court was told the Lavulavus had committed a carefully executed fraud over several years that amounted to a serious breach of trust.
Mr Justice Cooper told the court a pre-sentence report on āAkosita said there had been no attempt to repay the money, that she still maintained her innocence and showed no remorse.
The judge said āAkosita had supplied false references, something the pre-sentence report described as āan act of dishonesty which further proves her true character.ā
Mr Justice Cooper said āEtuate Lavulavuās offences were not out of character and was known to be deceitful. He posed a risk of re-offending.
The judge said a pre-sentencing report on āEtuate found that he still denied the offences; showed no remorse, blamed the court for being biased and did not accept his guilt. He had offered to pay all the money back in exchange for a community penalty and being spared prison.
āHad either defendant admitted their guilt and repaid the monies, as they seemingly can afford to do, then I would have approached this sentence in a totally different way,ā the judge said.
āInstead, Mr. Lavulavu offered what some might think sounds very much like a bribe to stay out of prison.ā
The judge said he had taken into account all possible mitigating factors to keep the overall sentence as low as I possibly could.
āI thought long and hard about the submissions in relation to Mrs Lavulavu and her being a mother of young children,ā Mr Justice Cooper said.
āI feel I am unable to lessen her sentence despite this. It could be argued that she deliberately put her childrenās wellbeing in jeopardy with her course of criminal behaviour; some might argue that was an aggravating feature to do so, I do not see it that way, but I do not lessen her sentence for that.
āBoth defendants were in this together and their sentences reflect this.ā
FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA
Kuo āi ai ha lipooti āo pehÄ kuo tangi āa e ongo Lavulavuā āi hona tautea ngÄue pÅpula taki taāu ono ka āo ka Ā hili pe taāu āe nima pea āe āatÄ āa Akosita āo maluāi angalelei ia āi hono toenga taāu āe tahaā āi ha toe taāu makehe āe ua āoua naāaā ne toe fakahoko ha hia ngÄue pÅpula. Taimi tatau āoku pehÄ āe he lipooti ko āeni āa e VPON āoku kole āa e ongo loea maāa āEtuate mo Akositaā ke peila pe tÄuhi kinaua ki tuāa ke tali ai āena tangiā. Ne na āosi kole peila ki muāa ke faka’atÄ ‘a ‘ena fefolau’aki he ‘otu motu’ mo Tongatapu’ hili hono fakahalaiaāi kinauaā pea naāe āikai tali ia āe he fakamaauāangaā. Ko e anga āeni e lau āa e lao āa Tongaā ki he meāa ko e peila āo fakatatau ki he kupu 4B āo e lao peilaā. āE āatÄ ki ha taha kuo tautea ke ngÄue pÅpula tuāunga haāane faihia ka kuo ne tangi āi hono tauteaā ke ne kole ki he fakamaauāangaā ke peila pe tÄuhi ia ki tuāa kae āoua leva ke mahino āene tangiā. Ka āe makatuāunga pe hano tali āo e kole peilaā āokapau āe fiemÄlie āa e fakamaauāangaā Ā ngali āe āi ai āa e faingamÄlie āuhinga lelei ke ikuna ai āa e tangi āoku faiā, pe ngalingali ko e tangiā āe āikai fakahoko leva ki muāa hano ngÄueāi kakato pe konga lahi āo e tauteaā pea āoku āi ai āa e tui mÄlohi ka tuku ange ki tuāa āa e pÅpulaā āe foki pe āiate ia ki he kau polisiā hala ke ne toe fai ha hia lolotonga hono peila ia ki tuāa. Fekauāaki mo ha tangi āi ha tautea kuo āosi fakahoko āe tokoni āa e fakatamala ko āeni ki ai. Naāe tangi foki āa e Tongasat mo Pilinisesi Pilolevu āi he 2019 hili āa hono fakahÄ āe he Fakamaau lahi āaho ko iaā kuo na halaia ki hono maāu taāetotonu āa e paāanga $90 miliona Tonga āa e puleāangaā. āI he tangi ko āeniā naāe fakamahino ai kuopau ke āi ai ha fakamoāoni foāou mo mahuāinga pea ko e fakamoāoni foāou ko ia naāe teāeki āo hake Ā iaā lolotonga e hopo ne iku fakahalaiaāi ai āa e pilinisesi mo āene kautahaā kae lava ke tali āa e kole ke toe vakaiāi āe he fakamaauāanga tangi āa e tangi āoku faiā. Ko e fakamoāoni foāou leva ne taku āe he Tongasat ko e pehÄ kuo nau toki maāu hili enau halaiaā Ā ko ha fuakava āa Looti Matoto mo Sunia Fili, āAholotu Palu pea mo Dr āAisake Eke. Naāe pehÄ leva āe he fakamaauāanga tangi āe tali pe ka ko ha fakamoāoni mÄtuāaki foāou āeni āi he āuhinga pe āe taha kapau naāe faingataāa fau ke lava maāu āa e fakamoāoni ko āeni lolotonga āa e hopo ne fakahalaiaāi ai āa e Tongasat mo e pilinisesi. Kae hili āenau vakai ki ai naāe pehÄ āe he kau fakamaau tangi, ko e fakamoāoni ko āeni kuo fakahÅ« ange āe he Tongasat mo Pilolevu naāe hala āatÄ ke toki maāu pe he hili āa e hopoā. Ko e fakamatala āa e kau fakamoāoni ko āeni ne āosi āi ai pe ia āi he 2008 mo e 2011 pea naāe āi Tonga pe kau tangata ko āeni ke nau omi ki fale hopo āo fakamatala ai ki heāenau fuakava lolotonga e lele āa e āuluaki hopoā. Pea naāe āikai ha meāa fakalao āe taha ke ne taāofi kinautolu ke nau fakamoāoni he hopo ko iaā. Ko ia ai ne āikai tali ia ke fakahoko āa e tangi ko iaā. āI hono fakahoa āeni ki he tangi āa e ongo Lavulavu āe āikai mamaāo āa e makatuāunga ko āeniā mei aiā. Kuopau ke fakahÅ« atu āe he ongo Lavulavu āa āena fakamatala mo ha fakamoāoni mÄtuāaki foāou āaupito ke sio ki ai āa e fakamaauāanga tangiā. Pea kapau te nau tali āa e ngaahi moāoniāi meāa foāou ko iaā pea āe tali leva ke nau hoko atu ki ha hopo tangi. Pea ka āikai Ā fiemÄlie kau fakamaau tangi Ā ki he ngaahi moāoniāi meāa kuo fokotuāu atu ke fai ai ha hopo tangi, pea ko āene levelevaā ia.
Former Cabinet Minister and MP āAkosita Lavulavu has been sentenced to six years inĀ prison.
Hon. ‘Akosita and her husband ‘Etuate Lavulavu
However, the Supreme Court suspended the last 12 months of her sentence Ā for two years on condition that she comply with the probation officer, satisfactorily complete a life skills course and commit no offence punishable by imprisonment.
Her husband, who has a long record ofĀ court appearances and convictions, will serve the full six years.
Both defendants were convicted on three counts of obtaining money by false pretences.
They were found guilty of fraudulently obtaining money from the Ministry of Education and Training by lying in applications for money from the Technical Vocational Educational Training Grant about the number of students enrolled at their private college, the ‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga Royal Institute.
Mr Justice Cooper, presiding, said, he utterly rejected their claims that the money was used for the Institute.
The judge said they could have been charged with theft.
The court was told the Lavulavus had committed a carefully executed fraud over several years that amounted to a serious breach of trust.
Mr Justice Cooper told the court a pre-sentence report on āAkosita said there had been no attempt to repay the money, that she still maintained her innocence and showed no remorse.
The judge said āAkosita had supplied false references, something the pre-sentence report described as āan act of dishonesty which further proves her true character.”
Mr Justice Cooper said āEtuate Lavulavuās offences were not out of character and was known to be deceitful. He posed a risk of re-offending.
The judge said a pre-sentencing report on āEtuate found that he still denied the offences; showed no remorse, blamed the court for being biased and did not accept his guilt. He had offered to pay all the money back in exchange for a community penalty and being spared prison.
āHad either defendant admitted their guilt and repaid the monies, as they seemingly can afford to do, then I would have approached this sentence in a totally different way,ā the judge said.
āInstead, Mr. Lavulavu offered what some might think sounds very much like a bribe to stay out of prison.ā
The judge said he had taken into account all possible mitigating factors to keep the overall sentence as low as I possibly could.
āI thought long and hard about the submissions in relation to Mrs Lavulavu and her being a mother of young children,ā Mr Justice Cooper said.
āI feel I am unable to lessen her sentence despite this. It could be argued that she deliberately put her children’s wellbeing in jeopardy with her course of criminal behaviour; some might argue that was an aggravating feature to do so, I do not see it that way, but I do not lessen her sentence for that.
āBoth defendants were in this together and their sentences reflect this.ā
Background
The Lavulavus were arrested and charged with fraud on March 3, 2018. Akosita was subsequently sacked from her Ministerial position by the late Prime Minister, āAkilisi PÅhiva.
She was appointed Minister for Infrastructure and Tourism by Prime Minister Pohiva Tuʻiʻonetoa in October the following year, while she was awaiting trial.
Tuʻiʻonetoa has so far taken no action against her.
FAKAMATALA FAKATONGA
PehÄ āe he fakamaau lahiā ne mei lava ke toe tÄ mo e tikite āa e ongo Lavulavu’ ki he kaihaāa (theft) makehe mei he faka’ilo kuoā na ngÄue pÅpula aiā ‘a ia ne faka’ilo pe kinaua he founga ne na ma’u kÄkaa’i’aki ‘a e pa’anga’ kae ‘ikai ko e kaiha’a. āI hono fakahÅ« atu āo e fakamatala ki muāaĀ pea hilifaki āa e tauteaā, āiloa āeni āi he lea āIngilisiā ko e pre-sentence report. Ko e lipooti āeni āe fai ia āe he kau āÅfisa polopeisiniā āaki āenau fakaāekeāeke āa e taha āe tauteaā ko e hÄ āenau ongoāi ki he hia ne nau faiā, hÄ ne nau fakahoko ai āa e hiaā, pea ko e hÄ honau puipuituāa fakafÄmili hangÄ kapau āoku āi ai ha fÄnau mo āenau ngÄue. āI he lipooti āo Akosita mo āEtuate naāe mahino āa e āikai haāana loto faktomala, na kei tuāuaki pe aāu ki he mÅmeniti fakaāosi āena tonuhiaā, pea mo taukaveāi ne na ngÄueāaki pe paāangaā ki heāena akoāangaā. Naāe āikai tui ki ai āa e fakamÄuā. āIkai loto āa Akosita ia ke totongi fakafoki āa e paāangaā peaā ne tÅ ai e lea āa e fakamaau lahiā ko āeni āo pehÄ kapau ne na fakatomala mo loto ke totongi fakafoki āa e paāangaā naāe mei kehe āaupito āa e tautea te ne hilifakiā. Naāe mahino ki he fakamÄuā ko āEtuate ia kuo pÄteāi faihia, tala āe ia āoku fakapalataha āa e fakamÄuā Ā pea āi he tui āa Nicholas Cooper āe toe fai hia pe āa āEtuate ia Ā he kahaāuā pea ko e āuhinga ia āa e āikai ke ne toe fakasiāisiāi hono tautea ngÄue pÅpula taāu ono’. Na’e loto ‘a ‘Etuate ia ke ne totongi fakafoki ‘a e pa’anga’ kotoa kae fetongi ‘aki hano tautea pe ia ke ngÄue ki he komiunitii’ pea ‘oua na’a ngÄue pÅpula. Ka ne pehÄ ‘e he fakamÄu’ kuo hangÄ tofu ‘ene ‘ai’ ‘ana ha totongi fakafufÅ« kae ‘atÄ mei pilÄ«sone’. Ko Akosita ne taāu ono mo ia ka ne maluāi angalelei āa e taāu āe taha fakamuimuiā āo holo pe āo ngÄue pÅpula taāu nima ka e toloi āa e taāu āe taha fakamuimuiā he taāu ua. Naāe āi ai mo e lave āa e fakamÄu foki ki he pehÄ āoku āi ai āa e fÄnau āe toko ua āa e ongo Lavulavu’ pea ke hoko ia ko ha meāa ke toe siāisiāi ange ai hono tautea ‘o Akositaā ka ne āikai tui pehÄ āa e fakamÄuā tuāunga he kei loto fefeka pe āa Akosita mo kavekaveaāu tokoua āoku tonuhia pe iaā pea naā e totonu ke kimuāa āene fakahoko āa e hiaā ke ne fakakaukauāi lelei āoku āi ai āene fÄnau. Na’e toe fa’u ‘e Akosita ‘a e ngaahi tohi fakaongoongo lelei loi ‘o ‘oange ki ha kakai ke nau fakamo’oni ai ka ne ‘ilo ia he lipooti ko ‘eni na’e ‘ikai ‘ilo e kakai ia ko ‘eni’ ki he kakano ‘o e tohi’. Pea na’e pehÄ ai ‘e he fakamÄu’ ko e ta’efaitotonu ‘eni ‘a Akosita kuo ‘asi lelei mai ai hono lanu totonu’.
The Lavulavu couple have been sentenced after incorrectly receiving more than TOP$500,000 when they owned and operated the ‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga Royal Institute.
Akosita Lavulavu has been sent to jail for five years while her husband ‘Etuate was jailed for six years.
They were convicted for using student numbers they knew were false to apply for government grants.
“This is an example of the worst sort of dishonesty,” remarked Justice NJ Cooper in his verdict.
After almost five weeks of deliberations, an Auckland high court jury on Thursday found Malia Unalotokilakepa Li guilty of the manslaughter of her husband Lanitola Epenisa.
Malia ‘Unalotokipea Li. Photo/Facebook
She is scheduled for sentencing next month. Li is remanded in custody to await the hearing.
The mother-of-two has been on trial after Epenisa died from the blood infection sepsis, after two strokes slowly ate away at his ability to walk and speak coherently and he developed pressure sores from immobility, the NZ Herald reported.
āHe was found dead by emergency staff in a MÄngere home, drenched in urine in a room with a bag of soiled clothes and a nest of miceā, the paper reported.
Lanitiola ‘Epenisa. Photo/Supplied
Li was charged with manslaughter for failing to provide her husband – deemed a vulnerable adult – with the appropriate medical care, hygiene, food and water between January and October 2016.
The Crown said Li left Lanitola Epenisaā in a La-Z Boyā chair, next to a nest of mice and piles of rubbish. Pressure sores on his buttocks became so deep they exposed muscle and bone.
The sores became infected from his faeces and urine and Epenisa died of blood poisoning on October 2, 2016.
Liās legal team said their client had done all she could for her sick husband, whose health had deteriorated to such an extent that he could not fight off infection.
OPINION: Convicted Cabinet Minister Akosita Lavulavu will be sentenced tomorrow July 2 at 10am.
Whatever her sentence, it will add a new chapter to the democrat MPs endeavour to push for more democracy in terms of good governance, transparency and accountability.
Minister of Infrastructure ‘Akosita Lavulavu and husband ‘Etuate Lavulavu. Photo/Akosita Lavulavu (Facebook)
In this opinion piece I will round up the debates and exchanges with the Prime Minister in the past two months on Akositaās saga.
I have previously made it clear that the Prime Minister owed the public a proper response to the repeated calls to dismiss Akosita because he was the one who chose her to be Minister of Infrastructure, Tourism and Transport. He knew when he appointed her in 2019 that she had been charged with serious fraud offence in 2018. He should have checked the legal implication of her charges and how they could affect the government.
Clause 51(3)(a) vs clause 23
Prime Minister PÅhiva Tuāiāonetoaās insistence, based on Clause 23 of Tongaās Constitution, that he cannot sack Akosita, was unfounded in many respects.
In fact, his power given by Clause 51 (3) (a) means he can do something, but he refused to do it and unfortunately, he appears to have attempted to mislead the public about this clause.
Clause 51 (3) (a) says: āMinister shall retain his position as Minister until ā (a) his appointment is revoked by the King on the recommendation of the Prime Minister or in accordance with clause 50Bā.
Prime Minister PÅhiva Tu’i’onetoa. Photo/Kalino LÄtÅ« (Kaniva Tonga)
This clause has two independent phrases divided by the conjunction āorā which means it is either the Prime Minister who can recommend to the king that a Ministerās appointment be revoked, or the minister can be revoked according to Clause 50B.
In his recent response to media in a livestream talk show the Prime Minister appears to have intentionally avoided talking about the first phrase and claimed his power in clause 51(3)(a) can only be exercised according to clause 50B.
In my opinion, Clauses 51 (3) (a) and the re-enacted Clause 23 appear to be in conflict when it comes to Akositaās case because one clause allows the Prime Minister exclusive power to sack her at his pleasure, while the other says she must not be sacked if she seeks leave to appeal her sentencing. It also says that if she is sentenced to no more than two years imprisonment she is still entitled to be appointed a minister, no matter how serious the offence committed.
When constitutions and laws clashed it is a matter for the judiciary to make a final decision and clarify which one is void.Ā Unfortunately, Tuāiāonetoa appears to have taken the role of the judiciary into his hands in this case and declared that Clause 23 was the only clause he could use and turned a blind eye to clause 51(3)(a).
A sensible leader should use his discretion and use the clause which will do what is best for the people, no matter what. In Akositaās case the Prime Minister should have stuck to Clause 51 (3)(a) and shown he had a sense of responsibility to the whole kingdom.
Shifting
The Prime Ministerās comments and response to media questions about Akositaās case clearly show he has shifted his justification when it suited him.
When asked about her pay while she was in court, instead of saying how many days were involved and which law justified her payment,Ā Tuāiāonetoa said Akosita was still working at the time and Cabinet ministers worked 24 hours a day.
Tuāionetoa was uncertain whether Akosita would appeal her sentencing. On June 5 he said āif after the 42-day period stipulated by the constitution is over and there is no appeal I will make the final decision.ā
But his most telling comment was when he said he did not want to sack Akosita as he feared she might take him and the government to court using Clause 23. He said he did not want to be penalised by the court and for the government to have to Ā pay Akosita compensation.
But the Prime Minister appears to have no concern at all about who will pay back the monies being paid to Akosita after her conviction and in the next 42 days if she appeals her sentence. Ā Of course she could accept her sentence and go to jail, or her appeal could be rejected.
That is why it would have been better for the Prime Minister to immediately take action and dismiss or suspend Akosita without pay under Clause 51(3)(a). If she did end up taking him and the government to court and won, that would have been it. It would have been fair to pay her back all her entitlements, salaries and allowances because the legal process had been gone through.
Precedents
In law there are precedents ā previous actions take by the courts of the legislature ā that are considered as an authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similarĀ legalĀ issues. In Akositaās case, there is a clear precedent for his dismissal.
Akosita was dismissed in 2018 by Late Prime Minister āAkilisi Pohiva after she was arrested and charged for the fraud of which she has now been convicted.
Prime Minister Tuāiāonetoa should use this as a precedent to dismiss Akosita. He should also use it in court if Akosita takes legal action against the government because of clause 23.
Akosita has been found guilty of plundering more than half a million paāanga from the government school grant scheme which was co-funded by New Zealand and Australia. The Prime Minister has a duty to spend every cent of public money wisely.Ā Instead, he has continued to reward her with the same benefits and entitlements given to other ministers who have not been convicted of serious fraud.
The end justifies the meansĀ
In English there is an idiom that says the end justifies the means used to achieve it. Whatever means the Prime Minister is using at the moment seem only to point to one end, to keep Akosita in Cabinet. But is this goal really enough to justify the financial implications, the chaos over theĀ Constitution and the effect on his governmentās reputation?
Akositaās court appearance tomorrow morning will determine the next chapter of this sorry saga.
A Tongan student at USP tested positive for Covid-19 in Fiji, Tongaās Minister of Education Huāakavameiliku told Parliament this morning.
Education Minister Hu’akavameiliku. Photo/Facebook
He said the person was in stable condition but gave no further details.
Fiji media said 312 positive COVID-19 cases and four related deaths had been recorded today, Tuesday 29.
As Kaniva News reported in May, a Tongan man was tested positive for Covid-19 and was quarantined in Nadi after arriving from Auckland.
Fiji was recordingĀ hundreds of daily casesĀ and the numbers would only increase if everyone in Fiji doesnāt get on board to help beat the virus, said public health expertĀ Dr Api Talemaitoga.
Taleimaitoga, an Auckland-based general practitioner who has been a part of New Zealandās Covid-response efforts, told Stuff New Zealand Fijian health authorities areĀ already struggling to contain the virus.
Talemaitoga said he was particularly concerned about the spread of misinformation about the virus and the vaccine on Fijiās social media.
āThe messages spreading on social media, that the virus is made up, the vaccine is something else ā itās just the … the enemy is the virus and the vaccine is the layer of protection they need,ā he said.
āPeople are just not taking public health advice seriously, and itās really disappointing. There is no cut-through, a lot are heeding advice, but there are still a lot that donāt want to follow or understand what that meansā.
A government interim committee is in charge of preparing Tongaās rugby league team for the October world cup tournament in England.
PM PÅhiva Tu’i’onetoa. Photo/Kalino LÄtÅ«
The committee was set up in May this year with the help of the Asia Pacific Rugby League (APRL).
Known as Interim Management Group (IMG), the committee undertook to do its best to restore the sport after a long-running battle over governance, money and a threatened player boycott.
The committee is working to select players and a coach, the Prime Minister said in a statement this afternoon.
The IMG members are:
Chairman : Prime Minister PÅhiva Tuāiāonetoa
Deputy Chairman and Treasurer : Minister for Finance TÄvita Lavemaau
Secretaries: Chief Secretary Edgar Cocker and Jeremy Edwards (from Asia Pacific Rugby League)
Action Committee members: Minister for Labour Tatafu Moeaki, CEO Dr Fotu Fisiāiahi, Scott Clark and Gareth Holmes.
The revelation came after the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed Tonga National Rugby League’s (TNRL) appeal against its expulsion from the global governing body in April.
The TNRL was expelled from the International Rugby League (IRL) in March last year.
The Asia-Pacific Rugby League Confederation last year endorsed the bid by a rival body, Tonga Ma’a Tonga Rugby League (TMTRL), for full IRL membership.
The revelation also came after TMRL president Lord Fakafanua previously said he would welcome it if TNRL and TMTRL were merged.
āTNRL is a separate entity with Mate Maāa Tonga. I would welcome the restoration of TNRL and Mate Maāa Tonga on the international stage but this is a conversation that must be initiated between TMT and TNRLā.
However, in May APRL said it was taking the lead on the future of Tongaās international membership.
It said there is no requirement for an IRL member to be in place in time for the Rugby League World Cup but an entity must sign the tournament participation agreement.
It also said discussions were already underway with the Tonga government, the national team management and TMT.
The IRL also said it received a letter from the PM Tuāiāonetoa, and “there was a commonality of purpose in what both parties want to achieve”.