Saturday, June 21, 2025
Home Blog Page 728

Tongan student to attend World War I commemorations in France

A Tongan student who won the secondary school essay competition to mark a World War 1 100th anniversary  will attend the memorial event in France in September.

Miss Anna Jane Vea was announced the winner on ANZAC Day and she will “join a New Zealand delegation comprising winners from Niue, Samoa and Cook Islands in France…”.

The essay competition for the Tongan students was run by the New Zealand High Commission in Tonga to mark 100th anniversary of the Battle of the Somme in the First World War.

Vea121
‘Ana Jane Vea. Photo/Supplied

The competitors were encouraged “to develop a greater understanding of the impact of the First World War on both Tonga and New Zealand”.

A statement from the New Zealand High Commission said: “Miss Vea’s winning essay spoke about what the sacrifices made by Tongan and Allied troops in the First World War and what it meant to her.  Aimed at preserving the World War I legacy in Tonga, the competition has increased understanding among youth of the Pacific contribution to the war effort and to their sense of identity today”.

“New Zealand High Commissioner Sarah Walsh announced the winners of the essay competition on ANZAC Day.  Stephaney Lakai of Vava’u won second place, and Sailosi Bloomfield and Malia Ekuasi received prizes for their highly commended entries.

“The competition has demonstrated the writing talents of Tonga’s young people and provided an opportunity for students to deepen their understanding of the important contribution made during World War I by Tongan soldiers and other Pacific Islanders,” said New Zealand High Commissioner Sarah Walsh.

 

READ MORE:

https://kanivatonga.co.nz/2016/04/dawn-service-at-pangai-will-mark-anzac-day-in-tonga-100-years-after-battle-of-the-somme/

Prayer, picking berries and family support led to law degree and admittance to High Court.

Prayer, determination and five years of picking berries led young Tongan barrister Eleanor Manu to graduate from the University of Waikato earlier this month and to be admitted to the High Court of New Zealand.

Lawyer Eleanor Manu

Manu graduated with a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) and a BA in Social Science, majoring in Political Science.

Elleanor began by studying Health Sciences at Auckland University, but did not do well in her first year.

However, she had passed a law paper and after praying, decided this was what she was meant to do.

She decided to enrol in law, but because she had done badly in her Health Science course, she was not eligible for any financial support and was faced with having to find $6000 for her first year’s fees.

After a lot of thought and prayer, she suggested to her parents that she could raise the money by going fruit picking.

Her mother Nanuma was hesitant because this was what she and her husband Vili had done when they first came to New Zealand and she remembered how back breaking the work was.

However, she found her daughter a place on a strawberry farm in Morrinsville, Hamilton.

The whole family joined her and spent three months picking.

“We started with strawberries for the first month, crawling from 4am to 4pm,” Nanuma said.

“As much as I didn’t want my daughter going through the agony of what I worked for when I first came to New Zealand, I was encouraged by her motivation and determination to strive for success.

“For three long months picking and packing strawberries, we finally managed to make enough to fund Noa’s first year of her Law degree and also were able to pay for my other five children’s educational studies.

In 2010 Elleanor enrolled in her first year of law at Auckland University. Later she decided to transfer from Auckland University to Waikato University’s Law School as a means to keep funding her studies through berry picking.

Nanuma said that for five years the family used berry picking as the main income to fund Elleanor’s education and that of her five younger children.

“We have done this as a family annually and it has been a blessing in disguise for me seeing the hand of God move in our life.

“The last and final picking season was just before Elleanor’s admission to the High Courts.

“I think it’s safe to say that Noa finally achieved what she set out to do and we can only hope that she will leave a long lasting impression that God is a God of possibility.”

Dr Mo’ale ‘Otunuku, who advised the family on Elleanor’s studies, said her success was the result of talking to her parents about her ambitions and their support for her.

“Students should get assistance from parents in the same way they get assistance from teachers,” Dr ‘Otunuku said.

“The parents must know their responsibility and do the best they can do to assist their children’s studies.

“The children should agree with their parents of what field of education they should pursue and make sure it is within the child’s capability.

“Some parents want their children to become a lawyer, but the children do not have any interest in law.

“Sometimes children choose their subjects just because their peers are doing them, but these courses are beyond their capabilities.”

The main points

  • Prayer, determination and five years of picking berries led young Tongan barrister Elleanor Manu to graduate from the University of Waikato earlier this month and to be admitted to the High Court of New Zealand.
  • Manu graduated with a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) and a BA in Social Science, majoring in Political Science.
  • Because she had failed her earlier course in Health Science she had to fund her law studies and with the help of her family, paid her way through university by picking berries.
  • The last and final picking season was just before her admission to the High Court.

READ MORE

Student who thought she was no good at accountancy celebrates outstanding awards

Growing up in poverty and lessons at ‘Unuaki ‘O Tonga drove academic success

Supreme Court says no to New Zealand-based Tongan family seeking guardianship of child

The Tongan Supreme Court has turned down an application for legal guardianship of a child by a Tongan family living in New Zealand.

In his ruling Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said that his overriding concern when considering the application was whether transferring guardianship was in the child’s best interests.

However, he said he had to consider whether or not the child would be better off if she was taken from Tonga to New Zealand, as the prospective guardians believed.

The applicants were relatives of the child’s natural parents and the Lord Chief Justice said he recognised that they genuinely loved the child.

The couple making the application did not have children of their own.

There  was  no  evidence  that  the child  would  be  allowed by  New  Zealand Immigration  to  travel  and  live  in  New  Zealand  on the  strength  of  a  Legal  Guardianship  Order.

The couple who applied for guardianship said they would apply to formally adopt the child under New Zealand law if granted guardianship.

“The applicants make this application for a Legal Guardianship  Order as they have been unable to have a  child of their  own and wish to raise the child in New Zealand where  they  believe she will have greater educational opportunities and ultimately  a better life,” Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said.

“They say in addition that if she  grows  up in New Zealand she will in time be able to provide financially for her family here in Tonga.”

In his ruling the Judge said the Court of Appeal had stated plainly that where the granting of Letters of Adoption  would  remove  a  child  from  Tonga, such an order should only be issued where all other means of caring for a child in Tonga have been exhausted.

The Supreme Court had applied the same  principle  to  applications  for  the grant of Legal Guardianship Orders.

“On  the  evidence  presented  to  me, there  are  perfectly  suitable  means to  care for the child here in Tonga with  her own family  and I am of the clear view  that that it would  not be in the child’s best interests to  make the  Legal Guardianship  Order,” Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said.

“The child has lived with  her natural  parents and four  older  siblings  for the entirety  of her life and  shares a close  relationships  with  all her brothers and sisters.”

He said he believed the child would experience   significant   dislocation   if  she were  to  move  to  New  Zealand  with  the  applicants,  particularly  in terms  of  language  and  schooling,  and  without  the  strong  familial connections  that  she  has  with  her  parents  and  siblings  to  support her.

The Judge said he said he was not satisfied the child would do better being raised by the applicants than with her family here in Tonga. The child had lived with her natural parents and four siblings for the entirety of her life and had clearly been suitably cared for.

“It appears  to  me  that  her  family circumstances are better than are enjoyed by many in  Tonga,” the judge said.

“It is clear in my view that the child’s best  interests  are  served  by remaining  in Tonga  with  her family.”

The main points

  • The Tongan Supreme Court has turned down an application for legal guardianship of a child by a Tongan family living in New Zealand.
  • In his ruling, Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said that his overriding concern when considering the application was whether transferring guardianship was in the child’s best interests.
  • However, he said he had to consider whether or not the child would be better off if she was taken from Tonga to New Zealand.
  • He said the applicants loved the child, but it would be in her best interests if she stayed in Tonga.

Body of missing Kiwi Gregory Reynolds found in Tonga

The body recovered from a bush in Hihifo in Tongatapu has been identified as belonging to the Kiwi man reported missing last week.

Police said 47-year-old Gregory Reynolds had been in Tonga for about a week.

Reynolds’ body was found in a bush near Likuʻalofa Beach Resort  on Sunday, 24 April.Missing Kiwi

His family in New Zealand have been informed.

The body was found after an extensive search in Hihifo conducted by Police, His Majesty Armed Forces and the community was called off on April 21.

No further information released at this stage as Police investigation continues.

Former Law Lord and Privy Councillor was adviser to king, diplomat and lawyer

The funeral service of Former Cabinet Secretary Lord Tufui of Talaheu will be held on Thursday.

Taniela (Dan) Hoko’ila Tufui died in Ballarat in Victoria on April 19. He was 83.

He is survived by his wife, Dr Kerry James Tufui.

Dan Tufui was one of the first four Law Lords appointed to form a new judicial committee of the Tongan Privy Council in September 2008.

Senior New Zealand solicitor and legal academic Guy Powles described him and the other Tongan appointees as fully deserving the recognition and honour conferred on them.

The other appointees were Baron Fielakepa of Havelu, Lord Tevita Tupou of Kolofo’ou and Lord Ramsay Dalgety of Sikotilani.

Dalgety was later severely criticised by the report into the Princess Ashika tragedy, which described him as dishonest and lacking integrity.

The three Tongan were the first to be created as life peers. The position of Law Lords had not previously existed in Tonga and was directly inspired by a similar institution in the United Kingdom.

Tufui was appointed to the council by the late King George Tupou V as part of the process by which His Majesty relinquished certain of his powers, but sought to keep control of the appointment of Judges and King’s Counsels, clemency and the commutation of prison sentences.

That same Tufui was awarded the Order of Queen Salote Tupou III, Grand Cross.

During his career, Tufui served the Kingdom of Tonga in a number of capacities.

As a barrister, he became the first Tongan to head the Law Department when he was appointed Solicitor General of Tonga from 1965 to 1972.

Tufui served as Chief Secretary to the Government of Tonga and Secretary to Cabinet for many years until his retirement from the Civil service in 2001.

He was chairman of the Higher Salaries Review Committee until ill health led him to resign in 2003.

From 2004 he was a member of the late Prince Tu’ipelehake’s National Committee for Political Reform.

He served briefly as Acting Chief Justice of Tonga in 2006.

He was chairman of the Pacific Forum Line and sat on the boards of a number of regional boards and organisations.

He represented Tonga’s interests in New Zealand on several occasions; fighting the New Zealand Seamen’s Union in the 1970s when it wanted all goods destined for the Islands to be carried on New Zealand-manned ships and leading trade missions in the 1980s to being New Zealand business and manufacturing to Tonga.

The main points

  • Former Cabinet Secretary Lord Tufui of Talaheu will be buried on Thursday.
  • Taniela (Dan) Hoko’ila Tufui died in Ballarat in Victoria, Australia, on April 19. He was 83.
  • Dan Tufui was one of the first four Law Lords appointed to form a new judicial committee of the Tongan Privy Council in September 2008.
  • He was also one of the first Tongan to be created life peers.

For more information

Death notice (The Courier, Ballarat)

Political and Constitutional Reform Opens the Door: The Kingdom of Tonga’s Path to Democracy (Guy Powles, Comparative Law Journal of the Pacific, 2012)

Lord juridique

Dishonest, evasive, lacking integrity – Scots QC damned after ferry tragedy (The Scotsman)

‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga denies serious fraud allegations, threatens to sue Dr Viliami Latu

The director of the ‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga Royal Institute (UTRI),  ‘Akosita Lavulavu, has denied claims by the Nepituno website that she and her husband ‘Etuate Lavulavu defrauded  the government of hundreds of thousands of pa’anga.

Nepituno is operated by ‘Etuate’s political rival, Dr Viliami Latu.

‘Akosita Lavulavu  told Kaniva News the Nepituno article had been copied and printed by other newspapers in Tonga, but none of them had contacted her or UTRI to obtain their side of the story.

She said the allegations against her and her husband were untrue and based on malicious intention and political bitterness.

She said she was filing a lawsuit against Dr Latu and the local newspapers.

Dr Latu claimed the Lavulavus faked the counting of students enrolled at UTRI so they could claim more funding from the Tonga National Qualifications and Accreditation Board (TNQAB).

Dr Latu claimed a complaint to the TNQAB had been made by some of the teachers at UTRI.

According to the website the complainants claimed the Lavulavus misled the nation by declaring that the school’s mission was to help young people, when in fact the students were used to collect money.

The Nepituno report  said UNTRI’s claim that it had between 400 – 500 students was untrue.

It said the teachers who made the complaint claimed they often rowed with ‘Etuate over their pay.

The Nepituno story said when they contacted TNQAB to check if a complaint had been received, it was told there was a complaint about the UTRI, but it was not processed because none of the complainants was willing to come forward and sign it.

‘Akosita Lavulavu  said TNQAB had told UTRI no complaint had been received.

She said she was told by TNQAB that if there had been a complaint against UTRI it would have gone through a formal process and UTRI would have been formally contacted.

‘Akosita said UTRI could not dupe the government on the number of the students it enrolled because the counting was done by officers from TNQAB and the numbers had to be audited.

She said claims on the Nepituno website that UTRI had 400 – 500 students were untrue as they only had about 100 enrollees.

She said UTRI’s founder, ‘Etuate Lavulavu, was no longer involved with its operation.

‘Akosita said the Nepituno story had affected her students and the reputation of the school.

She said she believed she and her school were being dragged into the political rivalry between ‘Etuate and Dr Latu.

‘Etuate Lavulavu became MP for Vava’u 16 after he beat Dr Latu in the 2014 general election.

However, he was disqualified by the Supreme Court decision after Dr Latu won a lawsuit against him for bribery during his 2014 election campaign.

The main points

  • The director of the ‘Unuaki ‘o Tonga Royal Institute (UTRI), ‘Akosita Lavulavu, has denied claims by the Nepituno website that she and her husband ‘Etuate Lavulavu defrauded  the government of hundreds of thousands of pa’anga.
  • Nepituno is operated by ‘Etuate’s political rival, Dr Viliami Latu.
  • ‘Akosita Lavulavu told Kaniva News the Nepituno article had been copied and printed by other newspapers in Tonga, but none of them had contacted her or UTRI to obtain their side of the story.
  • She said she was filing a lawsuit against Dr Latu and the local newspapers.

King performs groundbreaking of $66 million wharf upgrade

His Majesty King Tupou VI on Thursday performed the groundbreaking of the TP$66 million upgrade of Faua Wharf funded by the government of Japan.

The Japanese Ambassador to Tonga H.E Yuko Numata said: ” we celebrate the enduring friendship and mutual understanding between our nations through the ground breaking for the Project for Upgrading the Wharf for Domestic Transport.”

He said the new wharf showed how his government was willing to address the problems the people of Tonga faced when it comes to inter-island ferry transportation.

The Prime Minister of Tonga, Hon. ‘Akilisi Pohiva was appreciative and grateful of the Japanese aid funding.Japanese

“This project is symbolic pivotal role of Japan, in accelerating the social and economic development of Tonga since the establishment of diplomatic relations between our two nations,” he said.

Hon. Pohiva said the project was also an opportunity for the locals to get jobs.

“Ports encourage tourism, through facilitating visits of the global cruise business thereby generating both direct and indirect employment opportunities for the people of the Kingdom.”

 

 

READ MORE:

Construction begins on huge Faua wharf expansion

Tongan music legend Bill Sevesi dies

A great musician who grew up in Tonga before he was sent to study in New Zealand when he was 11 has died at the age 92.

His daughter Tania Jeff Sevesi confirmed his death on Facebook.

“…dad did really well, got to 92 years old and passed away peacefully”, she wrote.

(Revisited) This article was published by Kaniva News in August 2015 before Sevesi was inducted into the New Zealand Music Hall of Fame.

Bill Sevesi will become the first Tongan to be inducted into the New Zealand Music Hall of Fame.

Sevesi, one of New Zealand’s most famous musicians, was nominated for the honour to be awarded next month because of the impact of his musical talent on New Zealand life and culture.

Sevesi and his band, The Islanders, were a fixture in Auckland for many years and in later life he became a mentor to many young musicians.

He also played with many mainstream, artists, including Neil Finn and Dave Dobbyn.

Speaking to Kaniva News this evening, he said he was “shocked” when he was told that he would be awarded the honour next month at the Vector Arena in Auckland.

“There were better steel guitarists than me like Bill Wolfgram,” he said.

Born Wilfred Jeffs in Nuku’alofa, Sevesi was passionately in love with music as a child.

He grew up in Ma’ufanga in Tonga and even though he could not play or sing, wherever there was music he was attracted to it.

“I did not learn music in Tonga, but whenever or wherever I hear it no one could stop me. I would go there,” he toldKaniva News at his Mt Roskill residence.

“I would just go there and watch and listened to the music and the players.”

At the age of 92, Bill Sevesi has a really good memory. His interview with Kaniva News was mostly conducted in Tongan. Even though he moved to New Zealand when he was 11, his Tongan was still perfect.

He said that when he was growing up in Tonga, string bands visited villages at Christmas time and played their music to entertain locals. He also remembered when men played the music to accompany kava drinking at night while an unmarried woman served their kava.

“I followed them around and in the faikava I just went and sat there and passionately listened to their singing and playing,” Sevesi said.

Move to New Zealand

Sevesi was born in 1923 and in 1934 his family sent him to study in New Zealand.

Although his father was British and his Tongan mother was half English, Sevesi did not speak English in Tonga.

“I could not speak English when I come to New Zealand from Tonga. I just spoke Tongan,” he said.

“When I arrived here I went to school and the teachers talked in English. I did not know what they were talking about.”

He said he was told by the school to stay home and study English before he continued on his study.

Sevesi remembered he and his cousins stayed on a farm at what is now known as Manukau City.

He said after about two to three months he started to understand English language and then he returned to school at Old Papatoetoe.

The owner of the farm at Manukau sold the farm and they moved to Mt Eden Rd where he learnt how to play the ukulele from a Samoan woman who played at the neighbour’s place.

Later on he learned how to play Spanish guitar and steel guitar and met another Tongan steel guitar player, Oscar Witzki.

“He was Polish, but as far as I know he was born and grew up in Tonga. He spoke Tongan really well,” Sevesi said.

“He was outstanding in playing the steel guitar and we played together”

The idea to set up a group that would bring the name of Bill Sevesi to popularity in New Zealand and in the Pacific was born.

Bill Sevesi and the Islanders

Sevesi and Witzki were joined on piano by a woman called Doreen who was staying across the road . They also acquired a drummer.

Doreen had a boyfriend who played basketball. He was fascinated by the band’s music and encouraged them to play at the night clubs.

“We started playing at night clubs and it was not long before we attracted a lot of people to wherever we played,” Sevesi said.

“We were popular at the time because I believed we could sing and Island music was popular with people at the time.”

Sevesi grew up and started playing at a time when Hawai’ian music was a global phenomenon and the sound of lap steel guitar evoked a Pacific of palm trees, warm breezes and the exoticism of the islands.

As a boy in Auckland he tuned his crystal radio set to hear Sol Hoopi and other legendary Hawai’ian guitar masters and learned to play lap steel by listening to 78rpm records on a wind-up gramophone.

In the early 1940s he watched band leader Epi Shalfoon at the Crystal Palace in Mt Eden week after week until eventually he was invited up to play.

Bill Sevesi and his Islanders became increasingly popular at dances in the days before television. In 1954, after being invited to play at the Orange Coronation Hall in Auckland’s Khyber Pass (which he renamed, giving it a little more sophistication) Bill Sevesi and His Islanders became an Auckland institution and would remain there until the mid-1970s.

The Royals

Sevesi said he was once invited by the late Queen Salote of Tonga to play at a residence she was staying at in  Parnell.

He said Queen Salote was a great composer of Tongan songs and when he went to her he was well aware of the protocol and how he must address the Queen with the proper Tongan formal language.

Because he had stayed in New Zealand for a long time and there were not  too many Tongans in Auckland in the 1960s and 1970s he had begun to forget how to speak Tongan.

“I just told the queen I found it difficult to communicate with her and Queen Salote just told me: ‘Bill, my name is Salote and you just call me Salote,’ ” Sevesi said.

He played some music for the Queen before he was given food and returned home.

He said he was regularly invited to Tonga by Queen Salote’s son, the Late Prince Fatafehi Tu’ipelehake, for dinner.

“I and my friend Michael attended the dinner and the prince brought musicians to play to us while we dined,” he said.

Tongan players

Apart from Oscar Witzki, Bill Sevesi assisted Lisiate Sanitosi, Mele Nau Lino and Sione ‘Aleki, a well-known ukulele player in Tonga and the Pacific.

After 34 years in New Zealand he returned to Tonga and it was a visit he never forget.

“When I stepped down and walked on the land of Tonga I felt something very special in me,” he said. “This is the land I was born in and I can tell you I felt I was reincarnated. I would not forget Tonga.”

While in Tonga he was introduced by a cousin to Sione ‘Aleki. Bill said when he listened to ‘Aleki playing the ukulele he thought he had never heard such a brilliant performance before.

He invited Aleki to New Zealand and not long after Sevesi returned to New Zealand, ‘Aleki arrived from Tonga and joined his band.

He said there was a problem with ‘Aleki’s playing because he could not keep to the timing of the music and he helped him with that.

“I just told him that whenever he played he has to count 1, 2, 3, 4 or whatever time the music was assigned with and he did it,” Sevesi said.

His music

Bill said his band could play any style of music and that was why he thought it made his band really popular at the time.

“I am a firm believer in doing what our followers were asking for,” he said.

“When they requested songs we had to play it and if we did not know it we had to study it for the next time we performed.”

Sevesi and His Islanders made a number of records, sometimes under pseudonyms. His first recording was with country singer Tex Morton in 1949 with the band credited as The Rough Riders.

When they played with Canadian-born hillbilly singer Luke Simmons they were the Bluemountain Boys.

He recalled that when they recorded with jazz singer Mavis Rivers they were credited as “the Astro Trio or some damn thing.”

In 1959, when they recorded the song Bye Bye Baby Goodbye, he was Will Jess. The song – recorded in half an hour of studio downtime – was the country’s best-seller for four weeks.

In the early 1970s he left the Orange Ballroom and increasingly turned his attention to the modest home studio he built and to nurturing and encouraging the talent of others.

He recorded and encouraged numerous singers (among them the Yandall Sisters and Annie Crummer), played with fellow steel guitarists Trevor Edmondson and Bill Wolfgramm, and has appeared with Neil Finn and Dave Dobbyn.

His health

While Bill was being interviewed by Kaniva News his wife Vika Siola’a fetched him a cup of coffee and joined in. She said she was grateful that Bill was going to receive the great honour of being inducted into the New Zealand Hall of Fame in Music.

She said Bill had been to the hospital regularly and at some stages they did not believe he would make it back home.

Bill abruptly revealed that he once felt sick and was rushed to hospital.

“I felt I was dying, but a Japanese doctor was there with me and he was just playing around with things and he suddenly revived me,” Sevesi said.

“I had several strokes and heart attacks and a tumour in my head and I do not know why I was still alive.

“Maybe I still have great things to give to the community as I did with my music talent.”

Sevesi congratulated his wife Vika for looking after him, saying she was doing a really good job.

“She was much younger than me when we were married,” Bill said.

They have two daughters, Lauren and Tania and a son.

Bringing fairness to Tonga’s state broadcaster

Opinion by editor Kalino Lātū

Is it time to restructure the Tonga Broadcasting Commission?

The current situation in which senior journalist Viola Ulakai has been suspended by the Commission’s board raises questions not just about her own conduct, but the relationship between the broadcaster and Prime Minister ‘Akilisi Pohiva’s government.

In a letter to the Minister of Public Enterprises, Hon. Poasi Tei dated April 13, in which he recommended Ulakai’s suspension, the Prime Minister said: “These attacks from Tonga Broadcasting Commission are unbecoming from Government’s very own public enterprise. However, as many may agree, this has been ongoing since this Government came into office.”

Ulakai’s suspension was based on charges by the Prime Minister that:

  1. She lied when she used the name of the Tonga Media Council to request a press conference with the Prime Minister at which questions regarding his son Siaosi would be asked.
  2. She implied that the Prime Minister ‘son Siaosi owed his position at Educational Quality and Assesment Programme to his father’s influence, even though his son had held the position for many years before his father became Prime Minister and took over the Education portfolio. He said it was “demeaning” for Ulakai to believe this.
  3. In her behaviour in pursuing the issue of his son’s employment with EQAP, she displayed “malicious intent to damage my reputation and that of my Ministry.”

The first charge against Ulakai constitutes a breach of the Tonga Media Council General Code of Ethics for the News Media. The code’s guidelines on subterfuge say:

“Try to always use fair, responsible and honest means in obtaining material.  Identify yourself and your employer before obtaining any interview for publication or broadcast. Use of subterfuge (e.g. false identity or covert recordings) should be avoided.  It can be justified only in rare circumstances when the material sought should be published because of compelling public interest and cannot be obtained in any other way.”

Ulakai breached this clause because she falsely identified herself as representing of the Tonga Media Council. The President of the TMC, Lady Luseane Luani, later denied Ulakai was representing the council when she asked for a press conference. The President said she was not aware of Ulakai’s press conference request to the Prime Minister and the brand name could not be used by individual members.

Why did Ulakai not simply request the press conference using her position as Head of the Television and Radio Tonga? The Prime Minister supplied one possible answer last month when he declared the Radio and Television Tonga’s attitudes and conduct towards his government was different from what the way they behaved towards previous administrations.

I believe that Radio and Television Tonga and its news output in particular has a very clear bias when it comes to Pohiva and his political supporters.

Its television programme, Kanokato ʻo e Tālangá, on which Ulakai has interviewed some of the public and government leaders doesn’t always appear to be impartial.

To be blunt, some of the interviews seem to have been designed to indirectly attack the politicians of the left and their supporters.

The Prime Minister and Ulakai have clashed on air. In March 2015 Ulakai interviewed Prime Minister ʻAkilisi Pohiva about the appointment of Dr Palenitina Langaʻoi  as Chief Secretary and Secretary to Cabinet. The interview was conducted in Tongan.

At one stage Ulakai told the Prime Minister that Hon. Pohiva Tuʻiʻonetoa “should not” be a member of one of the panels that interviewed the candidates for the Chief Secretary because he had been cited as a referee in three of the interviewees’ applications.

Hon. Pohiva said he knew nothing about the matter, but that he and the panel had acted within the law before appointing Langaʻoi.

Ulakai abruptly asked Pohiva: “Who were the ones who recommended the panels?” Pohiva said it was the Public Service Commission.

Ulakai then asked: “Who were those people in the PSC?”

She said she knew that Dr Langaʻoi was still working for the PSC during the selection of the panellists. She suggested that Langaʻoi should have been removed from the PSC because she was one of the job applicants.

The Prime Minister told Ulakai he believed the PSC did everything according to the rules and her questions had strayed from the focus of the interview.

However, Ulakai persisted and asked Pohiva why the government had not established an independent committee to select the panellists when someone in the PSC was applying to the job.

Again the Prime Minister said he did not know, but said he knew that was the policy the PSC  select the panellists to do the interview.

Ulakai then suggested that it may have been better if Langaʻoi had been removed from the PSC so the selection could be carried out independently.

Again the Prime Minister told Ulakai all he knew was that the PSC acted according to the law.

Some viewers may have regarded the interview as an example of a journalist trying to make the Prime Minister accountable for the actions of his subordinates through a series of hard hitting questions.

However, many others will, I think, have decided that Ulakai was trying to hold the Prime Minister accountable to her own ideas about what the government should do and not what the government must do according to the law.

Many viewers would have been left with the impression that Pohiva’s government had done something illegal and dishonest before it appointed the Chief Secretary.

And many viewers would have regarded Ulakai as having politicised the interview.

It’s worth remembering that the code of ethics says that journalists should do their utmost to

“provide balanced coverage by proving a fair opportunity for any individual or organizations mentioned in a news story to respond to allegations or criticism before publication.  Failing that, you should provide a reasonable opportunity for response after the news item has been published.”

Tonga’s state broadcaster has been accused for many years of a general bias and partiality when it comes to Hon. Pohiva and the democrats.

The late former General Manager of the Radio and Television Tonga,  Late Tavake Fusimalohi, spoke to me openly about this.

There have been issues of real concerns that significantly affected the nation in the past, but Radio and Television Tonga turned a blind eye to them.

When it was leaked in 2012 to local media, including Kaniva News, that the government of Lord Tu’ivakano has transferred US$25 million in response to a request by Princess Pilolevu to help revive her Satellite company, Ulakai was the head of the Radio and Television Tonga’s news room.

This issue was never covered by the Radio and Television Tonga and there is no evidence that Ulakai asked for a press conference with the then Prime Minister to clarify the transfer of the Chinese funding intended to help develop the Tongan society to a privately owned company.

Nor, when she interviewed Lord Tu’ivakano or his Ministers, did she pursue the issue of the transfer of money with the same vigour with which she interviewed Hon. Pohiva.

Kaniva News does not condone the idea of the government or any organisation persecuting journalists or to unnecessarily controlling public information.

However, if we are to have a public broadcaster in the kingdom that is supported by taxpayers’ money, the public must be able to reply on it producing balanced and impartial news and stories.

Does that mean the broadcaster needs to be restructured?

The current situation could give the government an excuse to inject new blood, new ideas and new standards into the national broadcaster so it provides the kind of news the public needs.

Restructuring doesn’t necessarily mean  turning the broadcaster upside down, but at the very least it could mean restructuring its standards and responds to  the very real public concern about its perceived political stance.

For more information

Press release from the Tonga Media Council

Tonga Media Council General Code of Ethics for the News Media

Tonga offers journalists more freedom than the UK or the United States says new report

Journalists working in Tonga enjoy more press freedom than their counterparts in the United kingdom or the United States, according to a new report from Reporters Sans Frontiers.

And the rise in press freedom has coincided with the country’s introduction of democratic elections, according to RSF.

The World Press Freedom Index, which was published yesterday, placed Tonga 37th out of 180 countries. That represented a seven point rise over the RSF’s 2015 survey.

Last year Tonga rose 19 places to 44th on the global listing.

Pacific Media Watch attributed the 2015 rise to “an independent press, which has established its role as a counterweight to the government.”

Reporters Sans Frontiers said the independent media in Tonga had progressively assumed their watchdog role since the first democratic elections in 2010.

“They really began asserting themselves in 2014 in their criticism of the government and its policies,” RSF’s 2016 report said.

“However, some political leaders have not hesitated to sue media outlets, exposing them to the risk of heavy damages awards. Some journalists say they are forced to censor themselves because of the threat of being bankrupted.”

The highest ranking Pacific Island nation is Samoa, which placed 29th.

The RSF report said the country’s placing was due to what it described as the liveliness of media groups such as Talamua Media and the Samoa Observer Group of Newspapers, and individual publications such as Iniini Newspaper.

“The Media Council law adopted in early 2015 decriminalised defamation, but some media outlets have remained on their guard.

“The Human Rights Protection Party, which has ruled the archipelago for decades with no real political opposition, could be tempted to meddle in the Council’s business in order to exercise more effective and less visible control over the Samoan media.”

Papua New Guinea ranks 55th, a one place rise from 2015.

However, RSF warned that the requirement for Internet users to use their real identity on social networks could constitute a serious threat to online freedom of expression in PNG, where internet penetration rate is only about five percent.

The RSF report continued: “The government’s announcement in November 2015 that it was planning to create a special media tribunal to deal with ‘deliberate misinformation, spreading of falsities and malice,’” as the communications minister put it, could encourage widespread self-censorship in Papua New Guinea’s media.”

Elsewhere in the Pacific, Fiji ranks 80th, up 13 places. RSF said that despite the threats the constitution and legislation pose to journalists, the media had asserted their independence, improved the public debate and succumbed less and less to self-censorship.

Of the two largest regional economies, New Zealand ranks at 5th place, while Australia is 25th.

While New Zealand has the highest ranking of any country in the region, it is not without its problems. Reporters Sans frontiers noted that while the New Zealand media is free, it is not exempt from political pressure.

“The issue of whistleblowers and the confidentiality of journalists’ sources continues to be debated,” the RSF report said.

It said the media also continued to demand changes to the Official Information Act, which obstructed the work of journalists by allowing government agencies a long time to respond and making journalists pay several hundred dollars for the requested information.

Australia was criticised for the restrictions placed on journalists trying to report on conditions in the country’s notorious refugee detention camps on Nauru and Manus nor the operations ion Australia’s secret services.

Globally, however, the World Press Freedom Index shows a decline in respect for media freedom, with many countries introducing legislation that makes it harder for journalists to do their job or actively persecuting them.

The UK now ranks 38th, below Tonga, as does the United States (41st) and France (45th).

The World Press Freedom Index ranks 180 countries according to the level of freedom available to journalists. It is a snapshot of the media freedom situation based on an evaluation of pluralism, independence of the media, quality of legislative framework and safety of journalists in each country.

The degree of freedom available to journalists in 180 countries is determined by pooling the responses of experts to a questionnaire devised by RSF. This qualitative analysis is combined with quantitative data on abuses and acts of violence against journalists during the period evaluated. The criteria used in the questionnaire are pluralism, media independence, media environment and self-censorship, legislative framework, transparency, and the quality of the infrastructure that supports the production of news and information.

The main points

  • Journalists working in Tonga enjoy more press freedom than their counterparts in the United Kingdom or the United States, according to a new report from Reporters Sans Frontiers.
  • And the rise in press freedom has coincided with the country’s introduction of democratic elections, according to RSF.
  • The World Press Freedom Index, which was published yesterday, placed Tonga 37th out of 180 countries. That represented a seven point rise over the RSF’s 2015 survey.
  • Last year Tonga rose 19 places to 44th on the global listing.

For more information

Reporters sans frontiers

Media freedom: A nice RSF postcard from the Pacific, but not Asia (Asia Pacific Report)

Tonga, Fiji improve sharply in latest RSF World Press Freedom Index (Pacific Media Centre)